Sshh.. they probably already have.
2007-02-16 05:20:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
lol- it would be kind of hard to have an authentic page saying that, given that it would have to speak for the whole Bible, which unlike a movie saying that, was not written by one person. It's 66 books, written by 44 different authors, over 1500 years, on three continents in three languages; and was held as scripture by the nation of Israel for thousands of years, and the newer works were held by the early Christians up until now as scripture....
Plus there's the fact that when you stand on the principles and ways of relating to God, they hold up to real-life challenges every time.
As a scientist, I don't question another's work if I'm able to reproduce it in the lab, and to see it play out myself. I've seen the tenets of the Bible play out in life, so don't see it being "fiction."
LOL
2007-02-16 05:30:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by peacetimewarror 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Sorry. There is no "original bible".
There are fragments of text on scrolls and loose pages, all from various periods and places. When the Catholic Church gathered some of the surviving early texts into the Bible, they revised parts, later things were added or subtracted on occasion.
The only "original" religious text is the Book of Mormon. The manuscripts for it were written as a sort of science fiction by Rev. Solomon Spaulding, and came into Joseph Smith's possession after the Rev. died.
2007-02-16 05:23:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
it would of course have said;
αÏ
ÏÏ ÎµÎ¯Î½Î±Î¹ Îνα καλλιÏÎÏνημα ÏλάÏμα ÏανÏαÏίαÏ. οÏοιοÏδήÏοÏε ÏÎ¼Î¿Î¹Î¿Ï Ïε ÏÏÏÏÏÏο ζοÏμε ή αλλιÏÏ is καθαÏÏÎ±Î¹Î¼Î¿Ï coincidental
or transalted from teh greek into latin
is est a opus of fingo. Ullus similis ut alio victus vel secus est caste coincidental
2007-02-16 06:37:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i happen to have a large roman catholic bible
on the very first page is the text;
"first published in 1958"
and "copywright george rainbird 1958"
proof conclusive that christianity is only 50 years old!
i'ts all part of a big cold war conspiricy!!!
2007-02-16 12:29:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They picked and chose the texts that they wanted to include anyway, they would just say it wasn't part of the Bible, like they do with the other texts that don't say what they want them too. It would be nice if it gave them some insight, alas, it wouldn't though.
2007-02-16 05:24:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Huggles-the-wise 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
My difficulty with taking something like that seriously is the knowledge that that kind of "legal language" never existed until much much later when copywrite laws were first introduced.
2007-02-16 05:37:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by daisyk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be a hell of book just to write that as fiction. Though not eveything in it can be believed.
2007-02-16 05:30:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well.. there is no original Bible, which is the first problem with Christianity. Secondly, that would be hilarious to see 2.1 billion people suddenly have their basis for religious belief torn from underneath them.
2007-02-16 05:20:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Maverick 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Check to see the release date of the sequel.
2007-02-16 05:21:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by poetikliesense 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Thats not going to happen, foxy lady (a compliment)
What would you do if Jesus appeared to you, told you he was coming back soon, and to go out and save as many as you could for Him? - many have had visions of that sort.
2007-02-16 06:21:26
·
answer #11
·
answered by Cader and Glyder scrambler 7
·
0⤊
1⤋