Im no scholar or anything but is it possible that Jesus prefered man love?
2007-02-16 05:15:42 · 25 answers · asked by chris c 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yeah, he did live at home until he was 30, never married, hung around with a lot of guys, wore robes and liked to go to weddings. You draw your own conclusions!
2007-02-16 05:20:50 · answer #1 · answered by Mama Gretch 6 · 7⤊ 7⤋
Jesus said that in the Churches Christian men and Christian women are of equal value and so are Messianic Jews & Christians.
Jesus prefers one person over others for a ministry, calling, etc. An example is that the Lord calls some to be Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors & Teachers. Of these callings are men and women.
Jesus is the High Priest of the Church. Men are to love their wives like Christ loves the Church, to give his life for his wife.
2007-02-16 13:24:04 · answer #2 · answered by t a m i l 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
considering that the slang term for homosexuals "gay" wasn't in existance back then, and "gay" probably meant its original meaning "happy".
I'd be willing to guess that jesus led a happy life so the answer to your quesiton is yes, jesus probably was gay.
2007-02-16 13:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is Jesus Cruz down at the truck stop.
2007-02-16 13:28:40 · answer #4 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Possible. Maybe.
But not everyone that hangs out with a bunch of guys all the time is gay. That would make most of the male population gay.
2007-02-16 13:20:49 · answer #5 · answered by froggypjs 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
probable actually, the bible vividly describes him spending the night with a young man, laying with him in his bed and teachiong him "all the secrets of heaven"--since the bible emphasises this, and jesus taught love and salvation to everyone else, not "all the secrets" it's more likely to be the innuendo that it sounds like
2007-02-16 13:42:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely not!
The reason He didn't have any relations with women was because that's not what He was sent here to do.
2007-02-16 14:48:42 · answer #7 · answered by em<3 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't most Christians assume that he was totally sexless, i.e., had no sexual desires for either men or women?
2007-02-16 13:31:22 · answer #8 · answered by Billybww 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Since Jesus is God's Son, no not possible.
2007-02-16 13:26:27 · answer #9 · answered by Toe the line 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
This is going to wind up the shermans mate. Get ready for the abuse. Rather you than me. lol.
2007-02-16 13:21:35 · answer #10 · answered by iain xx 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, for the simple reason no such person existed outside the fantasies of religious maniacs.
2007-02-16 13:22:41 · answer #11 · answered by Stephen P 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋