Cure for cancer: No profit means no interest in it ?
A research scientest at the University of Alberta believes he will have problems with research money into a simple cancer treatment; because there is not profit in it, it is not a patenable drug.
January 16, 2007 - Edmonton - DCA is an odourless, colourless, inexpensive, relatively non-toxic, small molecule. And researchers at the University of Alberta believe it may soon be used as an effective treatment for many forms of cancer.
Dr. Evangelos Michelakis, professor U of A Department of Medicine, has shown that dichloroacetate (DCA) causes regression in several cancers, including lung, breast and brain tumors.
Do you think the fact that profits cannot be made in a cure, renders much of the research money into expensive pharamceutical drugs and treatments that are not the best ?
CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/edmonton/story/2007/01/17/cancer-chemo.html#skip300x250
2007-02-16
03:49:07
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Caesar J. B. Squitti
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
This is why we should try to eliminate the profit motive in disease treatment.
The healthier we are the more we can spend on GMC, Ford and Chrysler products.
Like I have said before, in Italy doctors receive a flat fee per patient per year, so they are motivated to keep you healthy and out of their offices.
2007-02-16
10:15:15 ·
update #1