English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

This question is 100% fiction. It has no answer. Don't forget Stalin. For some reason everybody remembers Hitler and the holocaust (catchy name) with a mere 6 million casualties and pushing it, and ignores Stalin with 20 million plus casualties? Are the Russians good or evil? sounds to me as there has been somewhere a dollop of brain wash.
P.S to max power
Hitler did not get "evil" with the rise in power everything he planed to do is in his book "Mein Campf" in the early 30's

2007-02-15 21:16:08 · answer #1 · answered by The Stainless Steel Rat 5 · 2 0

That is very hard to say. Outright killing is wrong. Even if Hitler had been killed prior to comming to power, someone else might have come to power who was equally evil. In the end, it might not have made much of a difference. Hitler was not the founder of the Nazi movement and party.

2007-02-15 21:59:45 · answer #2 · answered by daddyspanksalot 5 · 0 0

question is would it have been better if hitler died before the world war than him accomplishing what he did?
there are two sides, the obvious one is that, because of hitler the old europe was much united than ever you can look in history prior to the war, that US stepped out of it's isolationis policy during the early stage sof WW2 and formed the supreme allied forces as that later humbled the third reich, that the world has realised the worst that wars can bring, that the world has sympathize with the jews?...but if hitler was assassinated prior to everything? it's really difficult to guess besides it'll be pure assumptions.

2007-02-15 21:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

gods official position; if that';s what you care about; is that the ends don't justify the means, sounds familiar? that's why it's bad to do bad things to get what you want. Arguably in the great plan or just by mans beauacracy. perhaps killing one man cannot stop a nations racial hatred and extreme poverty and desperation. So you should not dirty your hands doing things that may not work as you intend. Always act with right action to achieve right ends as you ask this question in religion so that is the answer you get, me, i'm a pirate.

2007-02-15 21:15:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Evil

2007-02-15 21:22:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He was almost killed in WW I as a corporal. He was apparently hit with mustard gas.

Eastern Europe was a stinking cesspool of anti-Semitism, so there might have been any number of other criminal leaders rise to power in his place.

2007-02-15 21:12:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Killing is wrong. The only way you can even hypothetically ask a question like this-is by watching that piece of crap movie-minority report.

2007-02-15 21:11:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends on whose side you were on,the Allies or the Axis.
Yeah it would have been good,it would have saved thousands of lives throughout the world.

2007-02-15 21:12:59 · answer #8 · answered by Dfirefox 6 · 0 0

Evil, he got serious after his rise to power so to kill him beforehand would have been plain murder

2007-02-15 21:15:51 · answer #9 · answered by MaxPower 3 · 0 0

Killing people is to break a commandment ,except in self-defence.

2007-02-15 21:16:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers