2007-02-15 15:24:44 · 11 answers · asked by FAUUFDDaa 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Are you playing on words, Jim?
2007-02-15 15:35:36 · update #1
Most of the evidence is the fossil record and physiological and anatomical similarities and differences among animals, plants, fungi, etc on Earth. As we learn more and more about the biochemistry and molecular biology of cells, evolution is confirmed and supported. The biggest fact that really gets me is that humans are not perfect (I mean biologically). A lot of our anatomy and physiology just barely works, it could be much better and much more efficient. Its looks like it is just what happened to work, no designer would make mistakes like that.
2007-02-15 15:39:14 · answer #1 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going to go with the diversity of species in existence today. Thats what Darwin based his book on. The finches.
Darwin didn't need no fossil record or DNA or carbon dateing did he?
---
But the question is most of the evidence for,
so huh,
98% DNA with chimpanzees
--------
The dude just got Jim Darwin to reverse his answer,
this question made Jim Darwin think,
did you ever do that?
2007-02-15 15:30:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The believe all they read in a book of stories made up by half-naked, severely sun-affected sand savages based in Bronze Age myths, legends and superstitions. They believe 31 verses in ONE chapter of a book of stories made up to answer the questions of children and the scammers made up some stuff to satisfy them. Modern day science, especially medical science, is built on Evolutionary Theory. I wonder how many True Believers™ would take their sick son or daughter to a doctor – who was a witchdoctor steeped in Bronze Age myths, legends and superstitions … who ignored the discoveries of Modern Science. These Defenders of Ignorance above/before me ensure that USians will soon cease to be world leaders in Scientific Research – apparently the numbers of young USians going ‘into science’ are at an all time low. I am still reeling at the ignorance some answerers have shown … all based on FEAR … all based on the paranoid premise that there’s an invisible man in the sky who watches everything we do, think and say, 24/7. ~
2016-05-24 05:44:47 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now it's DNA that supports the theory and the thing that grabbed me is the developmental stage of gills in the human fetus.
How does the scientific skeptic explain that kind of thing .ther is much more follow the link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
2007-02-15 15:33:44 · answer #4 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you keep asking these questions when you already know the answer?
Science. Genetics. Chemistry. Fossils. Honestly, go and learn.
2007-02-15 15:31:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
um, some 150 years of research and experiments and observations since Darwin's Origin of Species?
2007-02-16 05:43:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fossil record for example.
2007-02-15 15:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
observations, test results.
Pretty much, once you have the evidence, it's simply a giant game of connect the dots
2007-02-15 15:32:10 · answer #8 · answered by Ghost Wolf 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fact that things go extinct and die and that the creatures most adapted to their environment survive.
Example: STD's
2007-02-15 15:32:29 · answer #9 · answered by dtimns 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, but i don't believe in evolution at all!
Noone realizes that Darwin changed his theory on evolution
on his death bed!!!
2007-02-15 15:31:40 · answer #10 · answered by Nat Nat 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋