You should be a novelist, or a playwright.
2007-02-15 12:11:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
at the same time as it is amazingly in all probability that Noah's Ark is in accordance to an fairly, yet very community, flood adventure a useless ringer for all different flood tale through different cultures, there is not any reason to suspect that the Flood as defined through the Bible ever got here on the fringe of occurring. First, there basically isn't sufficient water on earth to flood it to a 10th of the intensity that it would have had to be through conservative estimates. when we glance on the quantity of hydrogen present on earth, we see that there is not any longer sufficient hydrogen to make up the necessary large difference. a short calculation of the volumes of diverse sized spheres shows that if the water grow to be underground, the earth will be saturated to a intensity of a number of miles and could be no longer some other thing beneficial than a ball of muddy water. There are different major problems with the tale to boot. as an get mutually, a pragmatic estimation of the time had to load each and each and every of the animals into the ark is round 10 years, without allowing time to feed, water, do away with waste or assemble food and water. Off loading would have taken an similar era of time. Genetically, we may be able to inspect what the Bible claims and be conscious that it does no longer resemble what all of us study the species we've sequenced. as an get mutually, from what the Bible says, we would assume chimps (and unclean animal) to be a lot less genetically diverse than people and people to be quite a lot less diverse than "sparkling" animals. this isn't the case, all of us understand that chimps are more beneficial genetically diverse with people being more beneficial genetically homogeneous. there is basically no way that the Flood tale as appropriate in the Bible got here about.
2016-12-04 05:48:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is possible that he had some damage done to his left index finger. The damage could not not as bad as the brain damage of those who believe in his idiotic story.
2007-02-15 12:15:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr. Sabetudo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Haha, I like the way you think. I'm sure Noah did probably hurt himself, afterall, he's human, and he had a big project.
2007-02-15 12:13:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Noah was a white man
2007-02-15 12:10:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Evil Man 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why not? And he probably got splinters to. As a matter of fact, he and his kin must've invented all the cuss words. Everybody else died in the flood right?
2007-02-15 12:17:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gene Rocks! 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
He used ark welding techniques to save his fingers
2007-02-15 12:15:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha, I wonder if the expletive might have been "Jesus Christ" or "God d.amn it!". No, He wouldn't like that probably.
and yeah, that must have been when he invented ark welding, good play on words lol
2007-02-15 12:17:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably did,,like everyone else...It just can't be avoided,,probably got a splinter and some blisters too.
2007-02-15 12:12:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol probably, then noah's wife can be like, "god, i'm the only one who does anything right..."
2007-02-15 12:16:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say NO.
He was an expert, as was my dad. He could have built anything.
2007-02-15 12:14:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by jeni 7
·
0⤊
0⤋