Shouldn't both Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi be forced to sign a surrender document after they cutoff funding and force us out of Iraq?
2007-02-15 09:56:40 · 8 answers · asked by Yak Rider 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes along with big mouth Murtha. Let them put their signatures where their big mouthes are - so history can fairly judge everyone.
2007-02-15 10:05:46 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He grow to be an poor chief. besides the undeniable fact that Saddam's Iraq grow to be an effective counterbalance hostile to the Islamic Republic of Iran. They fought a vicious ten 3 hundred and sixty 5 days conflict, and maximum of Iran's militia resources were tied down protecting the border. Taking a militarily effective Iraq out of the picture has given Iran a a lot freer hand.
2016-12-04 05:41:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reid & Pelosi are cutting off funding to thieves like Cheney & his rabbit hole Haliburton in an effort to stop the Republicans from stealing the billions in funding Congress already tried to use to fund the troops you moron.
2007-02-15 10:34:15 · answer #3 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Everyone that voted for cutting off the funds.
2007-02-15 10:34:37 · answer #4 · answered by shawnn 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think the Israeli lobby will sign the surrender.
2007-02-15 10:11:49 · answer #5 · answered by DAVAY 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
surrender to reality!
2007-02-15 10:01:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
get into realty
2007-02-15 10:05:45 · answer #7 · answered by goldfreeblue 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
uh, we won, remember...
2007-02-15 10:16:57 · answer #8 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋