Microsoft embrace necessary updates to fix critical security flaws and even use them as a means to control your computer by making it necessary foe customers to allow additional content to be installed by Microsoft every week.
Why don't they get their operating systems right in the first place rather than using their customers as beta testers and exposing them to fraud, identity theft and viruses.
Why aren't people annoyed about paying for a finished product by receiving a work in progress.
Shouldn't they be embarassed and apologising instead of beligerently using the necessitiy to trust their downloads so they can make alterations to our system which we don't even want,
eg xp SP2 which stops most file downloads from starting automatically making life difficult for both customers and software vendors to transfer files.
2007-02-15
09:48:13
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Software
Techigril. I think you have it backwards when you say the customers should be embarassed that the supplier fails to supply something in good working order. Being any sort of supplier places a responsibility to provide goods in good working order and the fact that Linux is available does not absolve Microsoft from their reponsibility.
The main reason people buy Windows is not because of the operating system per se, it is that most software written for Windows. There is very limited choice for Linux and opensource programs are generally buggy and difficult to install. That is excusable because it is written by hobbyists who admit that they are offering work in progress, made in their own time and given away free. Windows, however, is far from cheap, is written by the richest company on the planet and has no excuse for being shipped while it still does not work properly.
2007-02-15
10:39:57 ·
update #1
Duckman. I doubt that you have designed an operating system so no point to ask me as if you have and I haven't. I assume we are both consumers, not Microsoft programmers or are you writing this in support of your boss? Every product is designed by a few people on behalf of many so that argument has no weight and the problem is not that we are beta testing for Microsoft while the OS is in beta, the problem is that we continue to beta test for them after the beta testing is supposed to have ended and the product is supposed to be a commercial release.
2007-02-15
15:14:08 ·
update #2