2007-02-15 08:44:52 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
no
2007-02-15 08:47:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is more a political question than a religious one, but I'll give it a shot anyway.
Probably not. Since Uday was a nasty piece of work he would have to go. Ditto for daddy-o. We would have let him stay in power if he had fully complied with the UN accords that he agreed to at the ceasefire in 1991. However, that would have ment giving up a considerable amount of power as well as making his own Baath party vulnerable to shiite unrisings in the south and kurdish uprisings in the north. It was only the threat of chemical weapons, backed up with a history of using them on his own people, that kept him in power as long as he did.
2007-02-15 08:51:36 · answer #2 · answered by Tim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, His son was just as evil as he was.
2007-02-15 09:01:47 · answer #3 · answered by rbarc 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋