What is the real difference between atheists and Christians?

Question

Is there any difference at all between the intolerance of the religious fundamentalists or the intolerance of militant atheist towards religious people? I think there is no difference at all but maybe I am wrong and some forms of intolerance are somehow better than others.

Answer 1

I dont like intolerance from either one. I dont forsee me ever becoming religious again, but I certainly dont want to shut communication down between me and people of faith, whatever that faith is. I believe there are issues that we can work together on. I do understand the reaction of people when others attack thoughtlessly.

Answer 2

The correct answer to your question is that there are certain similarities and certain differences. We're not totally different, and often our differences are accounted for by the analogy of a mirror: we're doing basically the same thing but heading in two different directions.

One difference, from a Christian perspective, is the misuse of the term "fundamentalist" by atheists. There seems to be no clearly stated standard for calling one Christian a fundamentalist and another Christian not. It's just thrown around subjectively like ______phobe (supply any one of a number of different terms).

Christian fundamentalism was a predominantly American phenomenon in the early twentieth century. Although its adherents disbanded to other groups, and its basic beliefs are reflected in many modern religious groups, theologically speaking no Christians consider themselves fundamentalists any more. So when my atheist friends ask me if I'm a fundamentalist, I get confused. That movement faded a half century ago, so I don't understand why that archaic terminology is still being used in their community today.

If you want to invent a new term. please define its parameters so we can properly identify ourselves.

Answer 3

When was the last time you saw an atheist campaigning against abortion or gay marriage, or threatening someone with eternal damnation?

Atheists are generally intolerant of the intolerance of Christianity, if that makes sense. Otherwise, they're usually tolerant people.

Answer 4

The militant religious have no evidence to back up their claims, the militant Atheist for the most part does.

Answer 5

(swear by technique of a e book that proudly boasts that all and sundry who would not consider it or stay their lifestyles by technique of it is going to finally end up in the fires of everlasting hell?) we only said it in our theology challenge: we ought to continuously no longer evaluate the e book because the know-how of sturdy because that's in elementary words a e book and only a written custom of the church. we ought to continuously no longer also evaluate the e book too actually yet to renowned it literarily. evaluate the "sitz im leben" meaning the placing of the tale. there a lot more desirable clarification theologically and that i'm particular human beings ought to understand the real meaning. in case you want, attempt to take some classes in theology. it really is relaxing, particularly, more desirable in case your instructor is sturdy.

Answer 6

Salvation

Answer 7

Please get yourself a dictionary.

Some forms of intolerance are better than others - maybe I don't want to tolerate slavery, child abuse or bad educations for children - what about that?

Answer 8

Why should Xtians be intolerant if someone chooses not to accept Jesus?

Answer 9

In a word imagination-atheists tend to have one and are a bit more broad minded in their exploration of beliefs and philosophies.

Answer 10

The real difference is this:

We're going to heaven.....
And unless they repent and believe.....they're going to hell.

Simple question....simple answer.