I mean ... pieces of his cross ( real ones), the nails , his cradle, his clothing...
How come they found every earing that belonged to Nefertiti, every temple built by the Romans and not a single thing that belonged to Jesus.
2007-02-15 00:59:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
So far as I know, Jesus owned only the clothes on his back. What would there be to find?
2007-02-15 01:03:29 · answer #1 · answered by iamnoone 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you imagine what that would be like? Look at all the commotion caused by the "shroud". Jesus was a carpenter, can you imagine if they found a table or a chair that he built? People would worship that piece of wood or that nail instead of the man.
But hey...that's just my opinion.
2007-02-15 01:05:31 · answer #2 · answered by stuckondaeastcoast 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Lots of claims, but every time that they are closely examined it turns out that they are fakes from the middle ages. So what you find are two categories.
1- Proven fakes that the church still holds anyway like the Shroud of Turin. (Although this was such a good fake that it is an artistic masterpiece on its own.)
2- Artifacts that the church has not allowed to be examined.
2007-02-15 01:07:48 · answer #3 · answered by Alex 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i imagine you want to take heed to from him that he has moved out. in case you in trouble-free terms had a $500 deductible, and the most suitable few days used that up on prorated lease, then basically deliver him a qualified letter that you consider his tenancy settlement closed and all sources left behind as abandoned. no matter if it is a small volume of sources, tell him you'll carry it for him in storage for no more beneficial than 14 days, and then you will be able to do away with it. then you quite basically container all of it up, perhaps placed it in a closet in the position of living no matter if it is in the different case sparkling, and after 14 days toss it.
2016-12-04 05:09:54 · answer #4 · answered by lesniewski 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe that was in God's plan. If we had pieces of furniture that he possibly made as a carpenter, then it would be too easy to believe that He existed. As far as the cross, that was probably used many times after Him, and they probably used it til it couldn't be used anymore.
God wants us to believe from our hearts, not remnants that prove His existence. However, His birth and death were recorded by government officials of that time. Why would the corrupt government want us to believe in Jesus? These days, they are probably mad at the person that recorded that information, since it is evidence of His existence.
2007-02-15 01:05:49 · answer #5 · answered by Christian93 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Holy Spirit who lives and dwells within me as a believer....
don't need any artifacts to prove He's real.
2007-02-15 01:02:49 · answer #6 · answered by primoa1970 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Shroud that they buried him in. Look up Shroud of Turin in Google.
Blessings!
2007-02-15 01:03:46 · answer #7 · answered by iamwhoiam 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Who is Jesus?
2007-02-15 01:02:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nerfertiti probably existed, the other chap is merely folklore.
2007-02-15 01:03:18 · answer #9 · answered by Ranjeeh D 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
just the shroud
2007-02-15 01:02:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋