What is Americans Energy solution?

Question

Long term and good on the environment?

Answer 1

For the country Atomic energy is the best for electricity, it uses steam to produce energy and does not burn oxygen or pollute the atmosphere with hydrocarbons, nor is it a major heat source, like fossil fuels. Next Use hydrogen ran cars, at least until we can develop environmentally friendly long lasting batteries, as for our planes and big trucks we would need to still use fossil fuels till we developed alternate energy. Nothing will put out the power of jet fuel the BTU's developed in jet engines can only be developed with the fuel it runs, Hydrogen can be produced by boiling water and extracting the h out of H2o, the by product of burning hydrogen is carbon dioxide and water plants love carbon dioxide and produce oxygen what a solution, huh? alas our economy is ran by big oil, yet they to are doing research into this, hey they got the money to research do you think they want to walk? Atomic energy is the only way we are going to keep going on. France already has 90% of its power delivered by Nuclear power plants it's safe and clean, now the life of plutonium is longer and we don't have all the answers for that some of it can be used after being fuel it could be used for medical purpose,'s. But we stil have to many people that are against it for some real reasons and for some not so real reasons. Do not let anyone fool you they have all the best answers because the best answers would make everybody happy but in life that is not going to happen.

Answer 2

I think I vote for Nuclear. I don't yet understand what happened at Chernobyl but I do know about Three Mile Island. The number of dead from the TMI accident is exactly and precisely zero. Coal miners, on the other hand, die of their occupation regularly. So, on a tombstone count, Nuclear is ahead of just about everything. You just have to convince people that there is no monster under the bed. Solid rational thought, not emotion.

Answer 3

the effortless reason is that drilling US oil would be bought on the international industry at despite is the going fee. If the democrats, or much greater valuable the republicans, will require that US oil be bought in trouble-free terms interior the U. S. at a under industry fee which could have some advantage, yet there is not any way that form of regulation would ever be handed. Given the above there would be no actual benefit to the patron via 'greater' drilling. the only thank you to maintain the wheels on the line given the certainty that the fee of gas will in no way flow down is to go as right this moment as attainable to 20 first century technologies. provided that Honda could wring out 38 mpg at seventy 5 mph, uphill with the air conditioner on back in 1985 there is not any clarification why that would desire to no longer be the minimum CAFE familiar now. The oil and US motor vehicle businesses have fought those improvments via fact the Carter administration. Given the fee of a gallon of gas now and the actual possiblity of $5.00 to $6.00 gas interior the subsequent 2 years the democrats have opted for shifting forward with greater valuable technologies. The discomfort we are experiencing now would have been prevented, and if we don't flow forward now the discomfort would be even worse down the line. so a strategies as American jobs are worried if the federal government performs it is enjoying cards amazing factories right here interior the states would be churning out severe mileage automobiles and automobiles...already there's a actual customer turn in direction of gas useful transportation. there is not any clarification why given the right tax incentives that for the time of below a decade we are in a position to be freed from a minimum of midsection east oil and we are in a position to be 50 to seventy 5% electrified via photograph voltaic and wind. ...yet another new industry which could hire thousands and thousands. All of it incredibly is plausible. the ultimate wing talk prepare propaganda bums save announcing that the fault lies with the 'liberals' that detest usa and p.c. 'our' equipment to fail so they'd deliver approximately 'socalism'.......i comprehend human beings have self belief that, yet in certainty, cases have replaced and entrenched hobbies such via fact the oil industry p.c. to wring out the final dollar they'd in the previous going under....and that they do no longer care in the event that they take the rest individuals alongside with them. No kiddin'!

Answer 4

Alcohol burns!! We have enough resources in this country to fuel our vehicles with alcohol based fuels, and synthetic lubricants. The only reason why this has not been implemented is because it would put a cramp on the fat cats in the oil industry who keep our fuel prices high, and they get tens of billions of dollars per year in profits.

If we turned to alcohol based fuels, we could send the Arabs packing.