'Blasphemer'.
And come on, Yoda, if you say there are no Roman records of Jesus, at least back yourself up with evidence. See my links below, the result of a simple Google search for 'roman records of jesus'.
2007-02-14 14:09:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Me ves y sufres 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Pharisees accused Jesus of heresy and blasphemy among the Jews, and sedition against the Roman Empire.
2007-02-14 21:55:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bobby Jim 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yoda Green obviously has done absolutly zero research. The accounts of Jesus are well documented. http://bibleprobe.com/archko.htm
He was called a blasphemer. They called Him Christ the Son of the living God and he said "I am". He never declared His own diety outright.
2007-02-14 22:04:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by spreading_the_word 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Roman officials did'nt call him anything, since he never existed.
Roman records of the period and area are quite well preserved and there isn't a single mention of him or anyone like him.
Gee, I wonder why?
2007-02-14 21:56:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Effinfibber.
2007-02-14 21:56:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
they thought he blasphemed when Jesus called God his own father.
2007-02-14 21:54:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
blasphemer
2007-02-14 21:54:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
usurper?
2007-02-14 21:53:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Midge 7
·
1⤊
0⤋