Underwater houses?

Question

When global warmign turns really bad and melts everything, how will we live? Will we have underwater houses?

OMG! I mean something like underater cities, where everythign is like, in a bubble of plastic, or metal. It might happen someday. AND BTW THEY ARE MAKING AN UNDERWATER HOTEL >:P

Answer 1

THAT IS SOOOOOOOOO COOL! ya i think that will tottaly happen

Answer 2

I actual have owned both underwater housings and underwater cameras. There are reward and drawbacks to both. first and maximum ideal, underwater housings are rated for one hundred to 2 hundred meters of intensity, even as cameras are hardly ever rated for more beneficial than 10meters. This score is likewise static, so when you're in a raging river or sloshing round in a surf - the position there is major shifting water - the intensity score of the digicam is degraded. also, very virtually all underwater cameras caution to no longer use it underwater too lengthy - oftentimes a million hour or a lot less. So even as underwater housings are patently more beneficial efficient, they're more beneficial cumbersome, and infrequently are more beneficial sturdy to regulate the controls. For scuba, an underwater housing is the more beneficial efficient decision, yet for snorkeling and purely fooling round in the water, an underwater digicam ought to do. yet i'd a minimum of get one which is rated at 10meters or more beneficial as they in additional than a number of circumstances have more beneficial gaskets and o-rings, and that not in any respect hurts. finally, in case you purchase an underwater housing, make efficient it has filter out threads, as you'll opt for a pink filter out. that is needed as there's a colour shift underwater, and so that you would ought to operate the fee of the filter out to the fee of the housing. The Olympus digicam, like maximum underwater cameras has a white stability placing for underwater use so that you gained't opt for a pink filter out.

Answer 3

A sustainable physical presence underwater is something that many in the science community believe we should persue above and beyond a colony in space... What is scary is that the government invests billions in space travel and yet budgets only a fraction of that to exploration of the oceans. There are more mysteries in the ocean then space will ever offer only because we can see most of space but we have never seen the bottom of much of the ocean.(sonar imaging does not count... I am saying physical sight.)

Answer 4

Even if all the ice in the world melted, it would only raise sea level 300 feet or so, enough to flood some coastal areas, but most of today's dry land would still be high and dry.

Answer 5

we dont do well in space and we dont do to well underwater. when you say "when global warming turns really bad and melts everything." at that point we would have been done.

Answer 6

that would be pretty dope to have underwater houses like spongebob and everyone else in bikini bottom but in reality i wouldnt like to open my door and there you see a shark or something else in front of your door.

Answer 7

No, we will all die.