at least you get to meet the author of Harry Potter?
2007-02-14 10:37:53 · 10 answers · asked by hwdfoo 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Both are the work of human writers, so both are so believable the same.
2007-02-14 10:43:41 · answer #1 · answered by Jesús V 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll preface this with the fact that I'm Deist. However, the Bible is a viable source for history. Do I believe in the supernatural parts of it? No, but many parts of it have been backed up with archaeological finds.
The Bible also shows a culture of a people. It is vital for our understanding of the past.
When you look at it like that, yes the Bible is definitely more believable than Harry Potter.
2007-02-14 18:49:42 · answer #2 · answered by Leonidas 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bible says that Harry Potter books are teaching witchcraft and witchcraft is a sin.
2007-02-14 18:45:47 · answer #3 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whether you believe in religion or not you can still use the bible. The bible has good philosophy (and also not so good ones). So, if you are not a believer then at least take that with you.
2007-02-14 18:43:27 · answer #4 · answered by mr_gees100_peas 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
2000 years from now Harry Potter could be God.
2007-02-14 18:43:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The BIble is indeed more believable. Broomsticks don't actually fly, plants don't scream, chocolate frogs don't randomly hop. In the Bible, inanimate objects generally stay inanimate.
2007-02-14 18:41:38 · answer #6 · answered by Jay 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is the pointless kind of question that doesn't do us any good. Read my answers to the questions about "We will have an atheist President?".
2007-02-15 01:01:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Less believable.
2007-02-14 18:46:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You make a compelling arguement..
2007-02-14 18:46:39 · answer #9 · answered by nicewknd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I ifnd it more beleivable.
2007-02-14 18:57:29 · answer #10 · answered by Krayden 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋