http://americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=8183
Lots of gems in there. But here is my favorite:
==================================
Second, ID critics allege that the theory fails to provide testable claims. Again, this criticism is demonstrably false: ID is eminently testable, has been tested, and is being tested constantly. As a matter of fact, ID needs no testing at all. The fact that design is the basic quality of intelligence is so self-evident that anyone who doubts it has to be exquisitely ignorant or entirely delusional.
=====================================
Bwahahahahahahahahahaha. This guy must be a real kick at parties.
2007-02-14 09:19:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think that link is incorrect. Use this one:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=19828
2007-02-14 09:26:48 · update #1
When I say "I don't know how it all started" and they take that as proof of god somehow....
Oh I love "The Banana Argument" or the lesser known "Pineapple Argument" too.
Oh, yes, yours is the best there. I like to read through FSTDT.com a lot but it is all so bizarre I can't recall any of it by the end of the day and I feel like my IQ dropped five points by the time I'm done.
He even quotes scripture in there. If that was on Y!A I would think it was a clone or a troll. And what Ann said
2007-02-14 09:24:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The most ridiculous is: just like any other creationists, he still doesn't know what "scientific theory" means.
Oh, right. (Banana argument)
RAY COMFORT!
Second link: "ID is eminently testable, has been tested, and is being tested constantly. As a matter of fact, ID needs no testing at all. " (What the phuck?)
2007-02-14 17:23:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Is that dude for real? What the hell is the American Chronicle?
--edit--
what a joke. did you check out his frontlinescience.com website? The nerve of that jack-ahole calling his b.s. science. His "independent think tank" seems to consist of Kazmer Ujvarosy, a Bible, a mediocre website, and not much else.
2007-02-14 17:25:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You ought to read the stuff over at "Fundies Say The Darndest Things" - http://www.fstdt.com
For example:
"I often debate with evolutionists because I believe that they are narrow mindedly and dogmatically accepting evolution without questioning it. I don't really care how God did what He did. I know He did it."
2007-02-14 17:37:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was just thinking if I could come up with a logical argument for water not being wet
But I did, so I stopped.
2007-02-14 17:22:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its a little odd
the universe was created by human intelligence not a divine creator???
not ID and frankly doesnt make sense if I read this right
2007-02-14 17:25:40 · answer #6 · answered by whirlingmerc 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah that's good science isn't it? So right it cannot be wrong. I'm sure Ptolemy felt the same 2,000 years ago.
2007-02-14 17:23:18 · answer #7 · answered by Gene Rocks! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about you, but "The Banana Argument" is the best possible band name ever.
2007-02-14 17:28:14 · answer #8 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For me, it'll always be the banana. Long live the banana argument.
2007-02-14 17:22:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
It has both circular logic and contradictory statements in a single paragraph. Amazing...... Then he says we are delusional???? My brain hurts now.
2007-02-14 17:24:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋