there was no pope, no bible, no enforceable code of morality.
murder was considered a 'cultural' activity. there was no
pro-life, people were no more than globs of protoplasm and
scientific atheism ruled the earth from day one unto doomsday.
what if the golden rule, really was, do always unto your neighbor
whatever the hell you feel like. what would life on earth be like?
heaven or hell? what if taking life was considered more moral
than creating it?
2007-02-14 08:59:25 · 9 answers · asked by joe snidegrass 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No animal on earth lives like that. Why would people? It's just a silly argument.
2007-02-14 09:03:18 · answer #1 · answered by Love Shepherd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Suppose the story of Christ was never made up...
Then taking life would not be considered "moral"
Those Aztecs needed "saving"
You know you are the type that gives religious people a bad name. Luckily people like Love Shepherd are here to remind us that there are good and bad in every group.
2007-02-14 09:02:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in case you initiate from the thought that the Catholic Church and the Bible are the source of an "enforcable code of morality," you're ignoring the tens of millions of human beings, previous to the Catholic Church's or maybe the Bible's existence lived morally as nicely via fact the tens of millions of human beings who derive their ethical standards from factors different than the Bible and the Church.
2016-12-17 10:04:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even BEFORE the Christian (and catholic) church, there were moral codes (hint: The Ten Commandments were from the OT).
2007-02-14 09:03:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
life would be different,thats for sure.taking life would never be moral.i could do without religion though,but i believe in God.He guides from within,not from a book that man wrote
2007-02-14 09:07:06 · answer #5 · answered by woodsonhannon53 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The results of your question would not be the results of atheism.
You are an idiot.
I will not answer this anymore then that....it isn't worthy of a legit. response.
2007-02-14 09:04:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then Man would be a rare kind of animal.
2007-02-14 09:03:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Catholic churchs would mean no Catholics. WHOOO HOOO.
2007-02-14 09:04:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
catholic is antiChrist they pray to dead people, and worship the pimp,may God have mercy on their souls.
2007-02-14 09:09:03 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋