for sure, there are many things that we dont know, and one of them is god.
isnt it better to tell i dont know god, other than i dont believe in god.
for me , for sure god exist, that god who i dont know him.
2007-02-14 08:32:42 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Ups!....., "I don't know Nothing of Everything I know"..., and also I know a little bit of everything, nothing perfect there is", (jean-Paul Sartre, french philosopher), although I know that God exist, and in my heart, and in my mind HIM(God) is real, I know that isn't the same to Love HIM, as to know HIM, and that is because I love Jesus my lord, for ever and ever and ever, so help me God.<
2007-02-14 08:44:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by paradiseemperatorbluepinguin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, and it is perfectly alright not to. When science doesn't know, it will tell you it doesn't not just make up an answer.
There is no evidence that there is a god. It isn't rational or reasonable to believe in things without any evidence to back it up. You would be stuck with hundreds of thousands of gods and everything else that human imagination could come up with.
Not believing in god, is the same as not believing in Odin, Zeus, Ra, Hera, The Great Spirit, Osiris, The Flying Spaghetti Monster and all the others. I would be no less surprised of evidence of Odin was found than I would be if evidence of your god was.
2007-02-14 16:40:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does not take all knowledge to disprove a thing if you can show the thing has a necessary consequence.
Free will is a necessary consequence of the existence of a meaningful (in the sense of: relevant, not moot) deity.
Free will is an impossibility in the universe in which we find ourselves. We make choices, but these choices are made by computational processes of the brain.
Thus, either there is no deity or the deity that exists is irrelevant and moot -- hardly terms applicable to a deity.
2007-02-14 16:40:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't need to know everything about the world to be sure there is no god. An omnipresent God would be everywhere so I would only have to look in 1 place. If I can't find it in 1 place it doesn't exist.
2007-02-14 16:36:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can you have the chutzpah to ask a question in that way as I have seen you and others of your ilk deny that there is a pantheon of Gods? The arguments raised that there is only one "God" is even contradicted in your own holy book. Stating Pagans, Buddhists, and Hindus worship of multiple Gods is false is neither proof that such be so or proof of that your monotheism is truth.
2007-02-14 17:08:25 · answer #5 · answered by Terry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think "for sure god exist, that god who i dont know him" translated wrong.
You can't know for certain. Just like you can't know the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist. It's just that the probability of God is infinitesimally small.
2007-02-14 16:37:11 · answer #6 · answered by Contemplative Monkey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is wonderful that you need a imaginary friend (God), then continue believing in what you need to in order to function. However, there are people who can think logically and realize that God logically does not make sense.
2007-02-14 16:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you know I'm not god - or god is a purple ant on the moon.
Wow we can't disprove it because we dont know everything - I guess that means its true.
Great argument, Einstein.
2007-02-14 16:38:27 · answer #8 · answered by Goodly Devil 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know enough about the world to understand the impossibility of an omnipotent being.
2007-02-14 16:42:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's fine for you. The rest of us need proof. If your gods show up in my front yard, perform a miracle, like creating a new species, them maybe we'll talk. Since that is unlikely, I'll live with my apostasy. Thanks for trying, though.
2007-02-14 16:40:50 · answer #10 · answered by link955 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋