...what do you AntiAtheists say about that? ...is it true??? my friend (who has a missing kidney) asks this question.
2007-02-14 08:00:23 · 22 answers · asked by BIGUS_RICKUS 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
...first you need some help with your words of Theocratic belief... The word A-theist... placing the letter "A" infront of the word, theost or Greek, Thoust then negates the belief... so in using the word "anti" you now change the meaning of Theo (God) again...
You are saying... "you are against the non-believer of God"...thus, "you" believe... (that what you've written)... now concerning his kidney...? what...? Science is still in the "dark" when it comes to the Knowledge of God...
2007-02-21 22:53:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science explains many things and will continue to explain many things. At one time acupuncture was a fantasy since science could not explain it. Now it does, to some extent. Karma is the same way. On the surface it does not make sense. But neither does Jungian Collective consciousness. But more and more people are beginning to realize that there is something happening and that is as good as any explanation, for now. But as many people have said science does not give a rat's patootie about god, but in its progress toward intelligence and information it disproves the more absurd ideas about god. The christian and Islamic god's have been well disproven, they just don't know enough to lay down and die. BUT, there "might" be a god, but he walked away from this universe untold trillions of years ago.
2016-05-23 23:15:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly not. It may have already proven that it cannot.
At least not to the level of proof.
It depends on how you see the full implications of Gödel's incompleteness theorem.
"In 1931, the Czech-born mathematician Kurt Gödel demonstrated that within any given branch of mathematics, there would always be some propositions that couldn't be proven either true or false using the rules and axioms ... of that mathematical branch itself."
Now whether there are realms outside the remit of science, which it cannot address, that is a rather different question. It has been argued, but I differ, and see the universe, all of it, visible and invisible, as the proper territory of science.
2007-02-14 08:13:48 · answer #3 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not everything. Science will never have such a capability -- it would require an exterior view of the universe.
It just gets more and more accurate with each passing experiment.
Godel's Incompleteness Theorum and Heisenburg's Indeterminancy Principle make knowing EVERYTHING impossible.
----------
Pedastal: Godel's Incompleteness Theorum does not hold under transfinite logic. Presumably, if we could get an exterior view of the universe, we could come to know everything about it -- except that Heisenburg still bites you in the butt if your external view follows the same flow of time as the internal view. If the external temporal view is distinct from the internal temporal view, transfinite logic would apply and both GIT and HIP fall away.
2007-02-14 08:05:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No it cannot. Science can help us to understand the physical realm that we live in and verifies the existence of God, the Creator of the physical realm and all of the life in it. Science does not have the ability to verify the spirit side of life. Science is only able to verify what our 5 senses are able to discern.
If you consider the physical realm, the cosmos and all of the life in it, to be the box created by God. Since God is able to be inside the box and outside of the box at the same time it does not make sense to only use the created "stuff" in the box to verify the truth that of the created "stuff" in the box.
God is an infinite being with no sides top or bottom. He created the physical realm and everything in it for His purpose and pleasure. This would make the spirit realm the dominate realm, since this is where God resides, not the physical realm. If we are only able to use information from the physical realm to verify our "truths" then we are leaving our self blind to the fullness of what the "truth" really is.
2007-02-14 08:18:40 · answer #5 · answered by David R 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The more we learn about our cosmos, the more questions we have. Philosophically, there are probably no boundaries to knowledge. Which is why a scientist would never claim that "science can explain everything."
However, if you were to rephrase your question to say that the scientific method is the best way humans have discovered to investigate the cosmos, then I would agree with you.
2007-02-14 08:12:41 · answer #6 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Science will never have answers to everything; that is the thing about science--the more we learn, the more we discover that there is to learn. We also discover that there are fewer and fewer reasons to believe in a God, as everything that used to be attributed to the power of an invisible deity, is known to have natural causes. The universe runs itself just fine with no need for the Magic Man in the sky to help it out.
2007-02-14 08:05:26 · answer #7 · answered by Antique Silver Buttons 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well l dont really think so, because science can give us bether education on issues but not everything thing on that particular issue.
again the bible tells us that God had hidden some things from human understanding and as such science can not explian every thing.
2007-02-22 05:10:34 · answer #8 · answered by alive soul 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it can.
In time, well everything its physically possible to know - exactly what that means is a different question but a total unified law of physics, codes of morality which we'd all agree on, yes.
Science has the potential to understand everything that exists.
It will never understand God because of what I said in the last sentence.
2007-02-14 08:08:49 · answer #9 · answered by Goodly Devil 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"can explain" is meaningless. Science have yet failed to explain many well know comming things human experience. Have science explained dream! I know people can come up with lots of explanation, but science don't even have any tool to check the accuracy of explanation
2007-02-21 23:21:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋