Despite how mean everyone makes this man out to be, I think he should be president. He tell's the truth about a majority of issues. He may be brash but he is honest, and offers many people to dispute his opinions, but they can never prove him wrong. I think he would be the next great Republican President.
2007-02-14 03:34:11 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
If he's smart he will keep doing what he is doing. We need more figures in the media like him. I understand why the left wing loony-toons and secular progressives don't like him..he exposes them for what they are, and they are ruining this country.
2007-02-14 03:42:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
is there a unmarried sentence in there that's smart? "there's a political comic obtainable (i forget his call) who makes a politcal fiasco of politics comical and opposite that's bill o'reilly." really makes no experience. "human beings criticise him for each reason out and in of the goverment's black listed e book" 0 experience being made. "he's the in elementary words fool who's calm in a global of chaos." are you complimenting or insulting him? you called him a fool, and then you're saying he's calm.
2016-11-03 10:37:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure at this point if anybody running is worth a vote. With two years before the election, it's turned into who has the most money for a full two years
2007-02-14 05:38:35 · answer #3 · answered by Zoe 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah why NOT..Oreilly has power already .He actually gathers &,verifies info, assess the pro's and cons, BEFORE he speaks!
--too many of our "legislators" craft their statements only to later whine that they misstated,or didnt mean to say/imply...or using hindsight and new info think that what they said/did MUST be SOMEONES fault...
They also Pander to their audience as they routinely say what that audience wants to hear to get "support" -which may be votes or the $$$ contributions need to get re-elected...
Oreilly certainly has the mental acuity,work ethic required to focus and find a plan /solution...since once analyzed and "debated" he produces a decision, or concise COHERENT statement that lists his rational and why he accept / rejects "X".
I'd vote for him for another reason; I would like to see someone tell CONGRESS to quit prancing and dancing with all the political power games.. The nation employed them and expects them to earn their salary. If unable to comprehend their job description or are unwilling to ,they should resign and seek to use their talents in Hollywood which works thru the hot air and "loves" good stories and fantasy...
2007-02-14 04:08:45 · answer #4 · answered by ymicgee 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
O'Reilly !! OMG EEEKKK!! HELL NO !!!!!
On the February 15 edition of FOX News' The O'Reilly Factor, in response to a viewer e-mail complaining about his "lying to the public about anything" and saying that his "show is full of lies about Hillary Clinton," host Bill O'Reilly called the viewer "delirious" and claimed: "No lies have been told about anyone, including Senator Clinton, and you can't produce one, madam."
Following are examples of O'Reilly lying about Clinton and other prominent Democrats and progressives:
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY):
O'Reilly claimed that former President Bill Clinton's presidential library gives her "access to money because Bill Clinton's got a checkbook that he can write anything off against that library he wants." In fact, the National Archives and Records Administration took over the management and funding of the library after its November 18, 2004, grand opening. [The O'Reilly Factor, 11/18/04]
O'Reilly has often claimed that "Hillary Clinton didn't go to one funeral or one memorial service of any of the regular folks killed at the World Trade Center, even though she's a senator of New York," despite the fact that Clinton attended several memorial services, including one for 79 restaurant employees. (O'Reilly has not explained who the "regular folks" are.) [The O'Reilly Factor, 5/13/02; The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly, 2/10/05]
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA):
O'Reilly egregiously misquoted Boxer during her questioning of Secretary of State nominee Condoleezza Rice and lied repeatedly to attack Boxer's record on fighting terrorism. O'Reilly claims that Boxer questioned Rice's "respect for the troops;" in fact, Boxer questioned Rice's "respect for the truth" after citing specific statements by Rice that Boxer claimed were untrue or inconsistent. [The O'Reilly Factor, 1/19/05; The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly, 1/20/05]
Billionaire philanthropist George Soros:
O'Reilly doctored a quotation by Soros from a 1995 New Yorker article to make it seem as though Soros had wished his own father dead. [The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly, 6/1/04]
Democratic National Committee chairman and former presidential candidate Howard Dean:
O'Reilly claimed that Dean wanted to "pull out of Iraq immediately," when Dean actually advocated keeping American military forces in Iraq to establish stability. [The O'Reilly Factor, 7/26/04]
Democrats
In a discussion about what went wrong for Democrats in the November 2, 2004, election, O'Reilly claimed that Democrats "lost votes from four years ago;" that "18- to 24[-year-old]s didn't go" to the polls; and that "[c]ommitted Republicans didn't carry the day for the president; independents did." All three claims are false. [The O'Reilly Factor, 11/4/04]
2007-02-14 03:43:43 · answer #5 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I think he's fine pointing out the truth. I would rather have Britt Hume as president than O'Reilly.
2007-02-14 03:36:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Since the Socialists fear him, you may have a good idea there.
I'd vote for him over Rudy Gullianni. Bill isn't a RINO.
2007-02-14 04:10:29 · answer #7 · answered by Hammer 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The Loofah in Chief. Shut up.
I don't think he's qualified to be a WalMart greeter, but then I say the same thing about Little Prince Georgie, and he was selected to be the host for gay hooker parties in the Lincoln, so what do I know?
2007-02-14 03:44:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Um, actually he lies and spins most of the issues. That is what is so cool about him, he will sit there and tell you it is the no spin zone, then go into his talking points memo that is all spin. And no one can prove him wrong because he changes the subject or cuts them off when they do.
2007-02-14 03:38:57 · answer #9 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Oh, please. This guy is a hack and a liar. He claims to have been "under fire" in wartime and has never been anywhere near the fighting. On top of that he settled out of court on sexual harrassment charges. He was making obscene phone calls to an employee. She taped them. He is lower than snake spit.
2007-02-14 03:38:49 · answer #10 · answered by notyou311 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋