2007-02-14 02:42:42 · 4 answers · asked by curious_inquisitor 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I beleive we should use the same standard on the unborn that we use on those outside of the womb. If one has a heart beat then they are alive. To end that heart beat - to take that life is murder. Why we insist on not using this standard on the unborn is beyond me.
No, I am not Christian.
I believe a lot of abortions happen because women don't want to be inconvinenced by a child. This is the reasoning I have heard from a lot of those who have chosen this route. Unfortunately, another option, adoption, is never talked about. There are a lot of families out there longing for a child - why not give yours to them.
Is it the height of immorality? Only if you believe it to be immoral to begin with, unfortunately.
2007-02-14 02:52:38 · answer #1 · answered by noncrazed 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. What about if the mother's health is in danger? Should the unborn have more value?
"never be harmed" - whenever you see an always or never...it is wrong.
~ Eric Putkonen
2007-02-14 10:57:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree. I saw a speaker (Gianna Jessen) once talk on the topic of abortion. She herself was aborted, but unsuccessfully, and she had to live with the health effects of that her whole life. That put a whole new perspective into things for me. I think her story is definitely worth checking out.
2007-02-14 11:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by Fenician 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most babies who die as a result of abortion are a choice made by the mother based on the inconvience that would be placed on her life.
How many people would you kill that are incovienet in your life?
2007-02-14 10:57:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋