Karla Homolka. Should she be allowed to have children?

Question

you thoughts? She just gave birth to a son.

Fot those who don't know who she is. She is a female serial killer who killed two teen girl plus her sister with her husband after drugging, torturing and raping the girls. She served 12 years I believe and her husband has life. She has since been released and now has a life. However, evidence indicates that she has never shown remorse for her crimes and is a psychopath.

Should she be allowed to raise a son?

Answer 1

I agree with everyone's answers. But she has served her sentence in the eyes of the court. Unfortunately she has rights, and the government can't take those away from her. Social Services can keep an eye on teh child...but that is all they can do. Yes she should have been in jail for the rest of her life...she should have never been given a deal. She was there, and she helped commit the horrific crimes. She blames her husband...but she is just as guilty as she could have stopped him. My heart goes out to the families that lost their children. I have read teh stories how they feel about her new baby...its something that they will never see their children have. But unfortunatle you can't sterilize her against her will. Laws need to be tougher!!

Answer 2

OMG!! i became so outraged that she had a baby. Why while maximum of folk attempt to have infants this monster gets blessed to have a baby. She does no longer deserve this exhilaration. one element although you're good she now will experience extra wisdom as to what HELL the mummy and dad of the youngsters she killed now that she has her very own. each thing differences once you have a baby. i'm able to't even think of what style of a existence this baby would have while he unearths out who's monster mom is. As on your question....i think of sterilization would desire to have been element of her punishment. understand that she has the baby..what's going to we do. it is not element of her sentence that she can not save a baby. i wish the toddler is placed up for adoption yet I notably doubt it.

Answer 3

I followed that case on the news and read a few bios about her. If the gov't lets her keep her child they are ****ing crazy! She is NOT meant to be a mother and she should STILL be in jail.

This is another one of those cases where the courts go wrong and only instill a very leniant sentence.

Answer 4

I don't think she should be allowed near children, as I would consider her a major sex offender. I know that she's blamed her husband all along and said he forced her to do the things she did, but it sure didn't seem like that in the videos they showed in court. She may be less dangerous without her first husband, but I don't think she should be allowed around children. Do you think her parents still speak to her?

Answer 5

I don't think she should be able to raise a child she is just a killer waiting to attack again and to put an innocent child in ahome with a person like that who already showed she would kill her own family is child endangerment.

Answer 6

Hell no. I am familiar with the case and I know she has tried to pin it all off on the ex. But there is a very strong potential for abuse of the child here.

Answer 7

I'm guessing that DCS is probably keeping a close eye on her - at least, I hope they are. That's a frightening thought.

Answer 8

no i don't think she should be allowed. i think she should still be in prison.

i guess now that she is a free woman no one can stop her. i guess the fact that she is a sex offender does not sound any alarms to social workers in canada. i heard her story before and it sickens me.

Answer 9

Good Lord, no! They need to take that baby away from her and make sure she's sterilized! She's not even fit to live.

Answer 10

nope she shouldent