Do you think the Biblical version of creation should be taught in physicis or astrophysics classes.?

Question

Astrophysics says the universe is over 10 billion yeas old and the earth is 4.3 billion, that the stars and the earth were formed by natural processes governed by physical laws. This seems to conflict with the bible just as much as evolution does.

Answer 1

If you have an untestable hypothesis, it is not science, it is religion. If you are going to present one, for fairness you should mention the other ideas.

Answer 2

There is no need to teach creation in these classes. Just as there is no need to teach physics in religious environments.

Certainly, the present age for the universe is 15 billion years and the present age for the earth is 4 billion years. This does not conflict with the Bible teaching. The powerful statement at Genesis 1:1 says this: "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." The heavens and the earth make up the universe in its entirety and there is no time restriction in Genesis of when this occurred. This account is quite compatible with the present ages given for the universe as well as any potential refinements in the future.

As for the earth being formed by "natural processes" governed by "physical laws" - that does not conflict with the Bible either. Such descriptions as "governed" and "laws" presuppose intelligence. To illustrate: traffic is governed and directed by traffic laws put into place by intelligent persons, yes? Do we reasonably believe that these signs, road markings, lights and lanes came about by "natural processes" independent and totally void of intelligence and intelligent design? The planets move in their orbits with such precision and fidelity that man is able to go to the moon and return, set up satellites, and even do something comparatively as simple as print calendars - complete with astronomical events such as full moons, new moons, etc. - years in advance. Why? Because of the laws governing the celestial objects with incredible precision. It is even as God speaks in Job chapter 38 regarding the constellations of Kimah and Kesil (verse 31); the statutes of the heavens (verse 33). Is it reasonable to believe that such magnificent precision and fidelity came about by chance?

Hannah J Paul

Answer 3

It is possible to teach both within the same class, but that probably will not happen any time soon. Science tells us that the universe has existed for millions or billions of years, consequently Einstein’s theory of relativity shows us that time in itself is relative the variants that are involved, like wise the measurement of time. Theologian and Islamic books tend to be very critical of anything that negates its teachings or forces them to rewrite themselves. Over 20 millennia ago these two dominant religions were brought to the people by prophets who interpreted the “word of God”. This would surely conflict with several scientific theories that are prominent in every aspect of our lives. Yet in many cases it circles around and boils down to Einstein’s theory of relativity. Respectively, the prophets’ and philosophers interpretations, dictations, and teachings and understanding of a higher power have effectively given birth to our civilized and democratic society. Scientists convey the notion that its ultimate purpose of existence is to understand the intricacies in which a “higher power” has created a universe of infinite possibility – which perfectly coincides within the strict religious structure of spirituality. If we were to completely extract the idea that science and religion are not at all contradictory and do in fact exist for the same purpose, we surly teach Biblical version of creation should be taught in physics or astrophysics classes. I hope I wasn’t too vague or incorrigible. ~Cheers

Answer 4

The Bible in Gen 1:1 stated that God created the heavens and the earth in the beginning. The heavens and the earth were created together at the same time. The earth is therefore as old as the heavens. The word of God should be taught as the word of God with revelation from the Holy Spirit. God's anointing is needed to share the word in spirit and in truth.

Answer 5

Well if the promoters of ID are being honest about just wanting to put both theories in the classroom for discussion they won't mind having an atheist pastor on hand to give a sermon in the church every Sundays I guess will they? Just for comparison of course?

Answer 6

I think it should be taught in project management classes. That was a lot of work to get done in 6 days!

Answer 7

Nothing contradicts faith, journeys of self- discovery, self- profession, and individuality except genetics. There are a only rare cases that the laws of the universe should be contradicted no matter the contradiction that boggles your mind in controversy. Discover in education and great books!

Answer 8

yet you have to keep in mind that these "facts" are just educated guesses as to the actual age of the universe and earth.

regardless
genesis 1:1"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. "

we are told here only the heavens and earth. the universe is not mentioned.

next you have to ask yourself, "could God had used natural processes governed by physical laws to create such things?" why not? it goes the same for evolution "could God had planed for us to evolve?" being as great and knowledgeable as he is im sure he knew that as the Earth changed we would have to as well.

Answer 9

if the bible is to be taught in physics why not the tora and all the other holy books? lets leave religion to religion

Answer 10

Of course you are just highlighting the absurdity of the Creationists position, and it is absurd.