What is the difference between Bubonic plague disease and cancer?

Answer 1

one will kill you out right(bubonic plague)

the other will take is time to eat you away until there is nothing there, and you hurt while it is happening(cancer)

Answer 2

The Plague was a disease that was transmitted by rats in the 17-18th century and wiped out a good portion of Europeans and there was no cure. The rodents had fleas which transmitted the disease to humans. That is where The God Bless You came from after a sneeeze also. The first sign of the disease was a sneeze and people would say God Bless You thinking that the person would die.
Cancer has many forms caused by who knows what and is not transmitted in the way the plague was.
i hope this helped some. Read history about the plague. It will help you understand the difference.

Answer 3

The Bubonic plague is a disease transplanted from fleas to rats to human without a cure that has killed millions over the centuries.

Cancer is treatable with medicine cannot be transferred as easily between humans.

Answer 4

Bubonic Plague is brought about by utilizing a pathogen/germ. It grew to become into tranmitted for the period of the plague in Europe (1347-1350) by utilizing flea bites from the Oriental Rat Flea, which grew to become into carried by utilizing rats (it additionally killed the rats). maximum cancers is provided in lots of categories, with an equivalent type of motives, yet none with an outright definitive reason in the back of maximum cancers. There are notwithstanding some viruses that have a hyperlink to maximum cancers. working example people who've had at one time or yet another Hepatitis B are a minimum of two times as in all probability to get Liver maximum cancers than people who have not, yet this is to no longer say that surely everyone who contracts Hepatitis B gets Liver maximum cancers.