English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-13 10:46:02 · 8 answers · asked by TheSilencer 1 in Consumer Electronics Camcorders

8 answers

it's a matter of preference

2007-02-13 12:21:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is a tough question to answer because there are so many different models with different levels of quality and different prices. And it really depends on what you mean by "better." It depends on what you want to use the camcorder for.

DVD camcorders have been around a bit longer than hard disk camcorders, so they might be a bit more fine-tuned. The DVD camcorders only record as much video as can fit on a DVD (20 - 30 min. I think) whereas the hard drive models can record much more. Those are the two biggest differences I know of.

I recommend going to a web site that compares various kinds of camcorders, such as CNET or EasyCamcorders.com. CNET in particular has a buying guide that gives you an overview of the various types of camcorders. Both sites have reviews of camcorders

2007-02-13 11:06:17 · answer #2 · answered by draccatcat 2 · 0 0

A big NO!
Overall, in fact, harddisc drive (HDD) camcorder is the best, as of this time, that has been made to record video footages, whatever and however you want to use it.

All the standard features of previous camcorders are on the HDD camcorder aside from its addition of really good features like longest video recording, high definition ready, less hassle & no downtime to change recording media. It also records video with same quality as with digital tape media.

The only advantage of the dvd camcorder is - videos are recorded directly onto a disc that you can play on a regular dvd player (that is, after 'finalizing' the disc).

Hope I made it clear enough.
Have a nice day!

2007-02-13 12:14:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

All ideas are open except HD and three chip. DVD record in trouble-free words 20-1/2-hour of HQ and it is more beneficial compressed than the different 2 and also you opt for application that can examine MPEG2 information to do any modifying. DVDs commonly do not provide both Firewire or USB help in trouble-free words Composite A/V. Mini DV documents for 60 minutes and makes use of AVI compression somewhat of MPEG2 so the image is sharper and has more beneficial determination. All instruments help FireWire yet in trouble-free words some help USB and in additional than a number of circumstances only for transfering nonetheless images. HDD cameras record from 3.5 to twelve hours, depening on length of force and high quality factor. those must be off loaded to a comptuer or set properly DVD recorder so that you could sparkling the force and record more beneficial. you could also record about quarter-hour on a a million GB SD card. those help Firewire and sometime USB and A/V composite. The not uncomplicated drives aren't from now on replaceable it is unclear how nicely they artwork hand held or if that disk would scare from being moved.

2016-11-27 21:12:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

What is your definition of "BETTER". I assume quality is the priority.

I have to say hard Disk is better, because they can hold more info than a miniDVD disk.


Depending on the type of camcorder, you may have options to choose from, before recording, such as "SP" or "LP", maybe they have bitrate settings, etc.

2007-02-14 03:24:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hard disk camcorders are better because they don't have as many moving parts.

2007-02-13 10:54:55 · answer #6 · answered by Santa Barbara 7 · 0 1

Depends on what you call better.

Hard drive has finer picture quality and longer running time.

DVD is easier to take to friends and relatives

2007-02-13 13:46:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hard disc is fixed time, DVD you pop in a new one when full.

2007-02-13 10:55:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers