Apparently the House and Senate have found a way to do just that with their "Toothless Resolution." The UN would be so proud.
2007-02-13 10:21:25 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
All Hat- OK, then what would the "Other" be in this case?
2007-02-13 10:34:33 · update #1
I TOTALLY agree that the UN would be so proud. I read a political cartoon the other day that showed a Marine in Iraq reading a letter and he told his buddy "Look at this, my senator sends me his nonbinding support".
Stay the Course
2007-02-13 10:31:56 · answer #1 · answered by USMC Recon 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't even begin to say that I understand this whole thing except to say that it's a slap in the face to the President and the whole freakin' bunch of them should be ashamed of themselves for the snivelling little cowards that they are. I hope veryone who voted for this gets a case of the drizzling.....you know what I mean, Montezuma's Revenge times 6.
2007-02-13 18:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by ret_rochcop 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You can't support and abandon the same thing or same person or people. You can support a goal but abandon a particular objective in favor of another.
2007-02-13 18:24:19 · answer #3 · answered by All hat 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what is diplomacy for 1000 Chuck?
2007-02-13 18:25:05 · answer #4 · answered by IndianaHoosier 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋