2007-02-13 08:47:01 · 7 answers · asked by zjkenny 1 in Sports ➔ Outdoor Recreation ➔ Hunting
The only thing I didn't like about the XD was the grip was a little short. With the extended magazine it weighs a little more but feels much better in my hand. It shoots great with no feed or extraction problems. It's a great carry gun too. Light and small but accurate.
2007-02-13 13:07:42 · answer #1 · answered by geobert24 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I own an XD .40. It's a little weighty (when compared to my HK USP 9mm), but it fires pretty accurately. I used to have a SW40VE...that was a piece of inaccurate crap.
Springfield XD's are good for the price. I've run into at least one other owner who loves his.
2007-02-13 08:57:22 · answer #2 · answered by jasohn1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its not a bad gun.. It's just the lack of parts available that keep me from owning any XD..Why not look at some of the smaller Glocks? They're reliable as hell and parts are easy to find.
And no a 9mm will not blow your arm off..LOL
2007-02-14 09:47:30 · answer #3 · answered by . 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It sounds like a nice weapon, at least according to the commercial magazine evaluators and editors who are paid under the table(and usually given free guns to boot). According to independent evaluators, it's right up there with Glock and better than a S&W Sigma, but comes in a far second to the flawless H-K USP.
2007-02-16 05:15:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
My sub 9mm, I have 3000 rounds down the pipe, and no failures as of yet.
2007-02-13 14:12:40 · answer #5 · answered by gunmanwatkins 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great, they are accurate and less money than others.
2007-02-13 14:10:36 · answer #6 · answered by thresher 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
damn-well...lets just say-if you got shot in the shoulder-ur whole arm would blow off
if ur talking about bibi guns then just a tiny welt
but outta a 10- for old time guns its a 10-for present day guns its prolly like an 8
2007-02-13 08:52:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋