those who defend themselves or those who conquer others countries and kill innocent children and women like what we all see in iraq and lebonen and we pretend that we didn't see anything.by the way i am italian living in the states
2007-02-13 08:40:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Matt D:
i really fall in laugh when i read your answer because u look so stupid and ignorant as u r acting like a pet ur president say that an issue is right so u belive in that and then he comes and say that issue is wrong so u belive and that is the disaster that all ignorant belive in what were thier government belive u have no opinion u can't make any jujment because u r afraid or whatever .by the way big universties in U.S. offer me scholarships to study here so i think they need me and don't need you
2007-02-13 10:20:46 · update #1
u say that: there are high numbers of collateral damage mostly because of the enemy putting civilians right in harms way.
do u think that a school for girls that was bombed consider a harm way?!!!
2007-02-13 10:25:32 · update #2
Those who conquer are the terrorists,yes of course. I also consider our government as a terrorist threat upon the Spirit of God. I'm shocked at how Christians defend this abomination on the creation of Our God!
2007-02-13 08:46:34 · answer #1 · answered by rezany 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Terrorists are people that adovacate, aid, or committ acts of military style violence against non-military civilian targets.
You are ridiculous in your assessment of what our military is doing over there. Our military only targets insurgent targets and unfortunately in battles like this there are high numbers of collateral damage mostly because of the enemy putting civilians right in harms way. And gullible people like you take what you read from the liberal idiot journalists in your country and come on here and look like a fool just to feed your anti-American anti-patriotic bias. Italy is ready to take you back!
2007-02-13 08:58:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A terrorist is someone who uses terror systematically, especially as a means of coercion.
You list two types of people in your question: those who defend themselves and those who conquer other countries. These two groups are not mutually exclusive. I can defend myself and also invade a country, killing women and children in the process. I can also kill women and children while defending myself in my native country.
On the other hand, I can accidentally kill women and children while I am occupying a country I invaded. I can also kill innocent women and children on purpose when I blow myself up on a bus.
Which is the best way? None of them are good, but only one of the people I described is a terrorist.
2007-02-13 08:50:04 · answer #3 · answered by Peter D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The difference between a terrorist and a freedon fighter is that you agree with a freedon fighter.
In your own cultural background, did people think that Mussolini was a hero or villain?
Did the Americans who sent millions of dollars to the IRA think they were supporting murderers, or not?
2007-02-13 08:46:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The RUSSIANS and the CHINESE who are supplying and supporting the terrorists in all of their attacks. The Muslims themselves are not our enemies. THe enemy is using the Muslims for their own geopolitical purposes.
2007-02-13 08:48:10 · answer #5 · answered by Tasha D 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who thinks they are right and that everyone else is wrong - they are the terrorists. Terrorists do not allow others a choice. It's conform, or die.
2007-02-13 08:44:56 · answer #6 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
a terrorist is anyone that uses fear as a method of controlling or directing a group of people. Hitler did it by demonizing the Jews, GWB did it by demonizing the Muslims
2007-02-13 08:53:46 · answer #7 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A terrorists In my opinion is anyone who threatens anyone's safety by fear or force.
2007-02-13 08:47:32 · answer #8 · answered by B"Quotes 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What is good for one is evil for another and vice versa. So to me, they are both eligible as being terrorists.
2007-02-13 08:46:41 · answer #9 · answered by Maikeru 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
U.S. is supposedly protecting itself by attacking Iraq, so in that regard they are not really "terrorists".
2007-02-13 08:45:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋