2007-02-13 07:46:16 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
PROOFS
only
exist
in
mathematics
2007-02-13 07:49:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Do you realize how stupid you sound? Evolution had long been proven before Richard Dawkins was ever born. What Richard Dawkins did was identify the gene as the fundamental thing that changes when a creature evolves. Far from not proving it Dawkins has explained how evolution works. Say no to jesus and idiots like you say yes to science and Richard Dawkins
2007-02-13 15:55:49 · answer #2 · answered by Say no to jesus 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Indeed, I imagine Dawkins would have some trouble restricting himself to a single proof.
2007-02-15 09:02:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yuri, Don't pay attention to what these stubborn Atheists have say. You're headed in the right direction and are very bright. You know the truth and God is with you. If these people don't get saved I pity them because they're going to be very upset on Judgement day, when God sends them to an eternal damnation. Everyone will bow to God on judgement day. They will soon see the truth, don't worry these people now have to fear God, for they have sinned against Him. I am sorry these people upset you, don't let them get the best of you, hold your confidence, pray to God, and everything will be alright. Please see these site for the reasons why evolution doesn't exist and Creationism is the answer: http://www.allaboutcreation.org/evidence-against-evolution-faq.htm .....I really hope I helped, God bless you.
2007-02-14 09:06:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well considering that no absolute "proof" has yet been found for the existence of atoms, that is hardly surprising. Science is not about absolute "proof" but about the accumulation of data and evidence to support or contradict current theories.
2007-02-13 16:18:31 · answer #5 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think that he has his theory that the effects of phenotypes dont have to stay in an organism's body because they can get loose in the environment and find homes in other organisms, and he says that life evolves due to the survival of different "replicating entities".
however it really isn't up to him to find proof for evolution because that proof has already been found in the fossil record.
2007-02-13 15:58:18 · answer #6 · answered by UFO 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree. In fact, I read his book, "The Blind Watchmaker", in which he attempted to demonstrate how complexity could form from randomness, using a computer program that he had created. The problem was, it took intelligence to create that computer program in the first place! So all he proved was that it takes intelligence to create complexity.
2007-02-13 16:06:31 · answer #7 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
there is actually a lot of proof about evolution
2007-02-13 20:15:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hey...I used to watch the Family Feud too.....
Oh wait.....
That was Richard Dawson.....
2007-02-13 15:49:42 · answer #9 · answered by primoa1970 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
About what? Your flawed statement preceding the question? You're a trickster, alright
2007-02-13 16:02:08 · answer #10 · answered by ThePeter 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋