2007-02-13 07:44:29 · 4 answers · asked by johnnyrottenteeth 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Quotations
Christina Rossetti
"WE WHO SHALL MEET AGAIN"
Oh tell me once and tell me twice
And tell me thrice to make it plain,
When we who part this weary day,
When we who part shall meet again.
When windflowers blossom on the sea
And fishes skim along the plain
Then we who part this weary day,
Then you and I shall meet again.
Yet tell me once before we part,
Why need we part who part in pain?
If flowers must blossom on the sea,
Why, we shall never meet again.
My cheeks are paler than a rose,
My tears are salter than the main,
My heart is like a lump of ice
If we must never meet again.
Oh weep or laugh, but let me be,
And live or die, for all's in vain;
For life's in vain since we must part,
And parting must not meet again.
Till windflowers blossom on the sea
And fishes skim along the plain;
Pale rose of roses, let me be,-
Your breaking heart breaks mine again.
2007-02-13 10:36:12 · answer #1 · answered by Unexpectedly George 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
ok, if that grow to be what I had to assert, how would I say it? more beneficial tangled than seaweed on the sea coast the rhythm cycle of our seize/launch souls sleep lower than the sea's tow trading gentle with stars putting decrease than the in trouble-free terms substitute in hue, the watery moon that in the heavens performs at Claire de Lune the sand a solemn shadow in love's wake that boardwalk's neon can not penetrate. i did not fairly intend that to be meterish or rhymed, besides the undeniable fact that the aspect grow to be i needed to eliminate cliches like "2 souls entwined" and nonetheless convey what you've been declaring. i can not use the note romance without cringing, and "arched then to grow to be fallen" is possibly your maximum ideal line and that i thoroughly neglected it, yet i love a number of your words and am no longer completely disappointed including your difficulty concerns (which I regularly am with this moony kissy things you do.) i'm no longer fairly particular what I dislike yet some thing is frequently off-putting in this stuff to boot the content cloth. for this reason it is type of: a) strobing between cliche to imprecise b) putting susceptible cloth prior to more beneficial advantageous c) lack of lyrical circulation "sand sky stars sex love bond peace entangled" looks to have each and each and every of the circulation up the front and then intellectualizes the completed very last 0.5. i'm no longer declaring a poem can not be like this, i'm attempting to describe why it isn't fairly operating for me. What i tried to do grow to be body the scene in the romance and lead them to synonymous through the top, so as that i'm expressing the relationship AND describing the scene. it might properly be garbage besides the undeniable fact that it is what i'd do.
2016-12-04 03:29:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes 'unexpected George' is right. What a lovely and sad poem.
2007-02-17 03:44:29 · answer #3 · answered by dtedad-50 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no answer - only my sincere thanks that you asked the question.
I was not aware of Rosetti's poem until I saw another's response to your question. The poem moves me deeply.
Thank you for asking the question!
2007-02-13 11:26:03 · answer #4 · answered by BlueFeather 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋