English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

it doesn't agree with The Bible

2007-02-13 07:39:58 · 28 answers · asked by sahara_springs 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

28 answers

Carbon dating is flawed,and that has been proven.At best it can
only assign dates (somewhat accuratly)to about 4,350 yrs.that
time period being after the flood of Noahs day.And even then it
can be inaccurate to a few centuries.

2007-02-13 07:53:49 · answer #1 · answered by OldGeezer 3 · 0 2

Correction - Carbon dating doesn't agree with your personal interpretation of the Bible. But so what? There are as many interpretations as there are denominations, and most of them are clearly wrong, since they conflict with one another, and truth cannot conflict with truth. So if your interpretation of the Bible conflicts with scientific data from hundreds of trained experts around the world, who do you suppose I will assume is wrong? You or them?

2007-02-13 16:25:59 · answer #2 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 0 0

Finding fault with the bible is not by any means an indication of anything wrong. On the contrary, finding fault with the bible is the first step in discovering a sheep free mind of your own and opening up a world of factual knowledge.

2007-02-13 15:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 4 0

I have known from some time now.

you see carbon dating is wrong because I made it that way.

I went back in time with my time machine and planted those things millions of years before god created the world.

unfortunately I created a time-loop that screwed up reality and as a result we have scientology and metrosexuals.

2007-02-13 15:43:50 · answer #4 · answered by Bluto Blutarsky4 2 · 3 0

But what does your heart tell you?

Jesus told his disciples over and over:

Seek and Ye Shall Find.
Ask and Ye shall receive.

He also warned:
Others will come in my name and say they speak for my father. Beware the false prophets. He who has ears, let him hear.

Do you have ears? Why can't you listen to Jesus yourself or must you hear it from the mouth of a man who sits higher than you upon a pulpit and wears robes declaring his superiority over you? The Priest and the Preacher are the false prophets that Jesus spoke of. They have all taken his words and perverted it.

I am no longer a Christian because all written words by the divinely inspired have been used as tools of Man to gain control and suppress the Great Work. It's no mystery. Humanity is here to redeem itself as a WHOLE. Until we put aside our petty insecurities and trust the source enough to allow IT to guide us to Truth where ever we seek it, whether it be Bible, Koran, Torah, etc, we will always fail to love one another unconditionally as we love ourselves individually. When individuals gather seeking truth, they will find it amongst themselves more quickly, but beware the Prophet or the man who comes in his name to teach.

The Bible is a wonderful collection of inspiration when it is taken with an OPEN mind. The religious orders and organizations and those that approved the Official Version have hidden away the juiciest fruits of Jesus' teachings. Seek them out and as Jesus said "beware he who comes on my heels, for he is a false prophet".

You have everything you need already inside you. I highly advise you to follow your conscience and do like every wise man ever did and Think for yourself and know that you have all the Truth you'll ever need already, you just have to see it for yourself. What that means is never stop asking for clarification, never stop asking until you have been awakened to the Truth.

2007-02-13 15:58:23 · answer #5 · answered by vicarious_notion 3 · 0 1

Oh, well, then. If it doesn't agree with the Bible, it must be completely erroneous. I mean, after all, the Bible is the sine qua non of accuracy.

2007-02-13 16:16:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Show me where carbon dating is mentioned in the bible and then maybe you'll have a case.

2007-02-13 15:42:50 · answer #7 · answered by manic.fruit 4 · 2 1

Do you not know that never not using double negatives isn't not bad grammar?

Did you know that the Bible is not an authoritative source for science?

2007-02-13 15:54:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LMAO the carbon dating must be wrong then

2007-02-13 15:45:22 · answer #9 · answered by Ganbatteru 3 · 1 0

Can you give me a legitimate study citing this "fact"? Is it only wrong because it disagrees with the Bible?

2007-02-13 15:42:51 · answer #10 · answered by sngcanary 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers