Not necessarily, actually 80% of the women who are HIV+ bare children who are HIV negative. usually the hospital would not know if the child is HIV +/- until 3 months have passed. usually when the child is tested ( whom mother is HIV +) tend to have a positive result, BUT this might be a false positive ( b/c the mother immunoglobins that react against the HIV in her body can be transfered to the baby, but not the virus). In our body there are five immunglobins (Ig) ( M, A,D,G). only the IgG can be be transferred from the mother to the baby, and is the one that usually is detected in the a child with HIV mother. if this immunoglobin persist for more than three months in the child then he his positive and if not then the baby is negative. even is the baby is negative mothers have to be precarious not to transfer it to the baby by breastfeeding , or any blood related contacts. I hope this would answer ur question
2007-02-13 07:33:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lost Fan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Imma ought to pass ahead and say that those human beings are really no longer particular.. yet definite, the toddler will be born HIV effective. My dad and mom both had STD's (my father replaced right into a cheater and gave it to my mom) even as my mom replaced into pregnant with me and my mom had to take over 5 pills an afternoon although out her entire being pregnant to get to boot as accessible because i might want to were born both blind and with the ailment. in case you recognize someone like this, they ought to commence antibiotics asap and pray for the proper..
2016-11-03 08:55:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not neccessarily. There is a medication that can be taken by the mother than is proven to help keep the fetus from developing HIV in the womb. It's called Nevirapine.
2007-02-13 07:17:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If proper medical care is given, there is a high probability that the child will NOT have HIV. Without proper care, it is likely that the child will.
2007-02-13 07:17:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They give something to the mother now that stops it from spreading to the baby sometimes.I am not sure what it is or how it works.Good Luck!
2007-02-13 07:17:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lisa M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not necessary. there have been many cases where the baby is fine. I don't really understand it. But it's true.
2007-02-13 07:17:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sugar 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's possible.
2007-02-13 07:16:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by * 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe maybe not
2007-02-13 07:15:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by god knows and sees else Yahoo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe
2007-02-13 07:15:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by babydruz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
~Not always.~
2007-02-13 07:32:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋