I know several people are spouting evolution. But everything would be a lot easer to understand if we could just stick to church science. And I understand it is now possible to get a degree in that, I believe it's called creationism. They even have a creation institute on the internet. So why do we have to complicated things and start in with evolution. Oh and by the way, if you live in Kansas write to your senator and tell him you prefer church science.
2007-02-13 04:29:29 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The words church and science should never be used in the same sentence like that. Oh, Not everyone one believes in the invisible sky daddy.
2007-02-13 04:33:41 · answer #1 · answered by Reported for insulting my belief 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
'Church Science'? Just by that name you know right off the bat that it is total BS. Church (i.e. religion) and science are at opposite ends of the spectrum. The religious have failed at calling the biblical story of creation 'Intelligent Design". So now this new 'Church Science' is the next attempt to try to somehow legitimize the fictional stories of the bible? Give it up. At best the bible is a collection of parables intended to teach lessons. Much the same as ancient Greek and Roman mythology. Therefore, a more appropriate name for the bible would be 'The Big Book of Christian Mythology".
2007-02-13 04:38:55 · answer #2 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The intelligent person understands both sides of this issue. You don't go spouting off to geological scientists about 7 days approximately 12,000 year ago and if you are speaking in a church where they consider the Bible as the infallible word of God, you don't go spouting off about "millions and billions of years ago". You will be made to look foolish in both situations.
Both sides agree on the concept of the "Big Bang", they just disagree as to when it occurred. Both sides agree that man did not witness the event, so, for most people, it really is not worth arguing about, because, either way, it has little to do with life right now.
2007-02-13 04:46:03 · answer #3 · answered by Paul K 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
whats up technology might no longer be any on the brink of the certainty, however the Catholic Church!! Come'on are you kidding me?? Adam or maybe nonsense and whatnot! I help the christian who first replied on your question tho, the catholic church is stuffed with nonsense... they have replaced the so referred to as holy testomony, further and erased issues from the bible, those human beings are a set of FAKES, oh and to no longer point out the way they suppressed and persecuted females and minorities in the time of history ans especial for the period of the midsection a while. How can everybody who's conscious of the fundamentals approximately history, purely the fundamentals, have any admire for this so referred to as corporation. I say i might somewhat help technology one million situations, no remember how furthered from the certainty they may be, then initiate having any admire what so ever for the Catholic church. No woman, no minority, easily no person in this international ought to condone with what those human beings, that catholic clergymen. have been doing to the human type. God isn't a chilly evil, self absorbed executioner or hangman who obsesses over techniques like punishment and sin, like the Catholics believe in, god is LOVE! imacatholic2 i comprehend greater approximately history then you rather and your catholic pretend conceptions will ever have the skill to gain. i ought to dismount any of your ignorant and prejudiced notions in a 2d if i ought to purely worry to gain this. you do no longer coach a clergyman approximately giving sermons, and you do no longer coach an archaeologist approximately history! working example what might you think approximately a barbarian? do you comprehend what the which potential of the word is, the place it comes from etymologically? What grants the final to call a individual who purely has a various perception and way of existence type you a barbarian?? What grants the final to call on western values as this type of good concern? what western values are you talking approximately? the full loss of a healthful relatives shape? Is that what you're talking approximately? i'm sorry honey, yet you are the living evidence of what i grew to become into talking approximately, purely as ignorant and prejudiced as in basic terms a blind catholic could be!!
2016-12-17 15:39:15 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Church science isn't science. It starts with a preconceived notion and looks for evidence to support it, ignoring or explaining away any evidence that discredits it. Science looks at the evidence and draws conclusions from it.
Church science would drop this country back to the dark ages and lower our collective IQ at least 30 points.
2007-02-13 04:36:57 · answer #5 · answered by KC 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think many believers are afraid to take church science seriously. All their lives they have been taught to take their religion on "faith" and feel that they somehow might be going against God if they look at anything else. As for non-believers, Church science means nothing to them initially but sure can cause they to ask some questions which might eventually bring them to God. At least I hope so.
2007-02-13 04:34:52 · answer #6 · answered by Poohcat1 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Church doesn't belong in science. And science doesn't belong in church.
The problem with "church science" is that it's not scientific at all. It attempts to redefine science by omitting the scientific method, which is how we observe and measure everything.
You can't measure God, so church science does not stand up to the scientific method.
If you want to teach people that God created the world, then go for it. If you want to hijack science, then there are some issues.
There are places to learn about Genesis; a science textbook is not one of them.
PS, in response to, "if you live in Kansas write to your senator and tell him you prefer church science," please do not command me to lie. I won't command you to torture children, and we can both be happy.
2007-02-13 04:32:57 · answer #7 · answered by Rev Kev 5 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Because if we relied solely on simple answers for everything we would have NOTHING.
You get it? Accepting the fantastic in place of finding out what really goes on HOLDS US BACK TECHNOLOGICALLY.
What if we had a huge population boost and didn't know how to feed everyone? Do we pray and beg god for a burger, or do we find a better way to feed people? C'mon!
2007-02-13 04:37:53 · answer #8 · answered by B-Hole 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
People have the right to learn about every theory and make up their own mind instead of being forced into one way of thinking or another. That includes church science and evolution.
For the record, I believe in creationism.
2007-02-13 04:34:33 · answer #9 · answered by Amy R 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Why not launch a full scale assault on Creationism and get it rooted out once and for all? In Europe it is a non-issue. I think it's time to move onto the offensive and get creationism purged once and for all.
2007-02-13 04:34:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋