English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

But on back the there is partially-hydrogenated oils in the recipe. How can the food industry get away with this? This is a joke and the FDA needs harsher restrictions with this stuff that is killing us slowly!

2007-02-13 03:07:45 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Food & Drink Other - Food & Drink

6 answers

I'm also confused by this, but I'm really answering because you crack me up. I'm gonna do my thang with the peppers now...(I laughed REALLY HARD at your answer)

2007-02-13 04:07:36 · answer #1 · answered by Freakgirl 7 · 0 0

The food industry gets away with it because the food administration allows them to list it as -0- trans fat if it falls under a certain amount per unit.

2007-02-13 03:31:47 · answer #2 · answered by golden rider 6 · 0 0

Isn't water partially hydrogenated, by 2 parts? What joke is that?

2007-02-13 03:26:45 · answer #3 · answered by eks_spurt 4 · 0 0

i agree, it is outrageous that they can say such a thing on their box. The trick they pull is that if there is less than .5g they can say there is 0g or not a significant source of trans fats. You have to look at the ingredients in that case

2007-02-13 03:12:30 · answer #4 · answered by mattatlincoln 1 · 0 0

in accordance to the meals and Drug administration, if a product has .5g of fat or much less in it then that's considered "fat loose". it incredibly is the reason PAM Cooking Spray (that's a hundred% fat) can be referred to as "fat loose". In different words, it does not even have 0g of fat in it, whether it is "close adequate" for the FDA.

2016-10-02 01:58:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

look up on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_fat

2007-02-13 03:11:04 · answer #6 · answered by deliciasyvariedades 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers