When you claim that the Bible has been corrupted. Do you call Mohammed a liar? Mohammed nowhere in the Koran claimed the Gospels (Injil) were corrupted. The word 'tahrif' no where is mentioned in the Koran in relation to the Christian Gospels.
In fact, the Bible predates Mohammed by 500 years, and the same Bible Mohammed would have seen (had he seen one?)
is in 1. the Vatican (Codex Vaticanus) and 2. The British Museum (Codex Sinaticus). It is all there, Jesus dying on the cross as atonement for our sins. And his resurrection, ascension into heaven- in front of many witnesses. The New Testament is preserved in almost perfect condition in these two Greek texts which both predate Mohammed and Islam.
Surely then you do not forget:
Sura 5:46 -And we sent after them in their footsteps Isa (Jesus) son of Marium (Mary), verifying what was before him of the Taurat (Torah) and we gave him the Injeel (Gospels) in which was GUIDANCE AND LIGHT, and verifying what was before it of Taurat
2007-02-13
00:43:34
·
7 answers
·
asked by
great gig in the sky
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
and a guidance and admonition for those who guard (against evil).
Is Mohammed a liar, or are those that say the Gospel is corrupted liars?
2007-02-13
00:46:45 ·
update #1
You miss the point. If you say that men wrote it, and say they corrupted it, you neglect to mention that it was ALREADY WRITTEN-STILL EXISTS, and that Mohammed said that it was GUIDANCE and LIGHT.
2007-02-13
00:58:44 ·
update #2
By any means -Are you saying that the Angel Gabriel did not know of the Bible in existance? It still exists, Worldwide, there are 24,800 copies that all agree with each other, as well as 80,000 quotations in the works of Early Christian writers,which are so extensive that the New Testament could be reconstructed from them, even if the complete texts did not exist, BUT THEY DO! Then there is the obvious fact that the Christian Gospels were so widely distributed, that any attempt to add/subtract would have resulted in immediate discovery and condemnation.
Additionally, the Gospels have been prached and handed down since Apostolic times, and it's genuineness has been guarded by numerous churches and even zealously watched by Christianity's enemies. A great controversy would have ensued had it been modified. Some minor words differ here and there, but the ESSENTIAL THEOLOGICAL POINTS remain the same, and are COMPLETE.
Do you deny that the angel Gabriel revealed it, or that:
2007-02-13
01:52:31 ·
update #3
Sura 5:48 "And we have revealed to you the book with the truth, verifying what is before it of the BOOK (Bible) and a guardian over it"
Sura 46:12 "Yet before it was the book of Moses which was an authority, and a mercy. THIS IS THE BOOK CONFIRMING IT IN THE ARABIC TONGUE"
2007-02-13
01:58:39 ·
update #4