Oh no no no, it was tricky ol' Yahweh!
2007-02-12 16:36:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
K a) a lot of the old earth evidence is actually misinterpreted... there is plenty of proof that this is a new earth.
b) even if all the evidence that this is a new earth was proved wrong, than there would still be the fact that we don't know how long the Garden of Eden was around. Adam and Eve could have lived in it for thousands of years before sinning, and their ages would have been calculated from the time the Garden of Eden ended versus when they were actually created.
2007-02-12 19:01:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i imagine the placement with creationists is they take the verses in the Bible too actually even as the account in Genesis mentions the be conscious "day". they have come to the properly that the Earth become created in six 24 hour days. some declare that because Moses later suggested the day that suggested the six imaginitive days as a type for the weekly Sabbath, then each and every of the imaginitive days must be actually 24 hours lengthy. (Exodus 20:11) notwithstanding, the Hebrew be conscious translated “day” can advise multiple lengths of time, no longer only a 24-hour era. operating example, even as summarizing God’s imaginitive artwork, Moses refers to all six imaginitive days as faster or later. (Genesis 2:4) to boot, on the first imaginitive day, “God began calling the uncomplicated Day, notwithstanding the darkness he called nighttime.” (Genesis a million:5) right here, in trouble-free words component of a 24-hour era is defined through the time period “day.” actually, there is no foundation in Scripture for arbitrarily stating that each and every imaginitive day become 24 hours lengthy. also, they fail to keep in mind that God does no longer view time the way that people do. each and every thing we do is defined through time. yet God isn't constrained or forced through time. He has continually existed and subsequently has come to view time in diverse words than people. that is why at 2 Peter 3:8, the Apostle Peter ought to hopefully say that 1000 years is as faster or later to God. in accordance to this kind of figuring time, an 80 twelve months old guy would have in trouble-free words lived for more beneficial or less 2 hours, and all of mankind's historic previous would have lasted for some days. As one among Jehovah's Witnesses, i'm in many circumstances confronted through those who insist that we are creationists and fundies, yet a short communique can straighten out any misconceptions. i wish any creationists obtainable interpreting this will pay interest to this and seem up the suggested scriptures. it is unhappy that some gained't supply a relationship with God a probability because of lots of the untruths that they have got heard from those who tutor through custom, and not in any respect scripture.
2016-11-27 19:33:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by buckingham 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientist probably have a geological evidence factory in Korea.
2007-02-12 21:19:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
EARTH IS VERY OLD
Gen.1:1,2;
God expects some one to be expert in this field, any body can guess billions of years
as to the average person, what need is it to them.
Gen.1:3-25;
The high number of thousands of years here to prepare the earth has some important facts, plant life and times and seasons for then [ as we know it now ], is not the say as day age of time for God, after thousands of years of plant life, there is thousand of years of animal life, followed by thousands of years of domestic animal that will be of great benefit to the next creature.
Gen.1:26;
God said,"Let us make man in our image, after our likeness."
HERE SCIENCE HAS GOT TO BACK OFF.
Every thing about world history bears all total, full and complete evidence that the thousands of years of time involved here is fact inside the bible and outside the bible.
The only unusual creatures that can be found would be those that came to be extinct because of the flood that left and earth that is not life sustaining. So science does not believe in angels that existed first before anything else. WHAT CAN ONE SAY?
I BELIEVE IN GOD, HIS ANGELS, JESUS AS THE VERY FIRST, AND ADAM CREATED 6,073 YEARS AGO, THAT BABYLON EMPIRE NUMBER THREE [ DESTROYED THE PROMISED LAND OCCUPIED AFTER ESCAPE OF EGYPT EMPIRE NUMBER ONE ], ENDED JUDAH KINGS [ THERE WILL BE NO KING UNTIL JESUS AT HIS SECOND COMING ], AND JESUS WAS IN ROMAN EMPIRE NUMBER SIX 2007 YEARS AGO.
Rev.20:1-6,12,13; No Satan for 1000 years.
Eph.2:7; 3:21; The world with Jesus is without end. John 3:16; 2Pet.3:13; All made new
Rev.21:1-5, all made new, 8 is second death. Rev.20:7-10; Final cleansing. End of 1000 years, all perfect passes into the kingdom and paradise of God. Rev.2:7;
2007-02-12 17:36:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by jeni 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
It was Jimmy Hoffa using a time machine. He did it to further his radical Communistic ideals. It's a good thing we've got King Bush to put the Industry Barons back upon their golden thrones which rest upon the backs of the oppressed workers. Jesus would want it that way.
2007-02-12 16:40:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Christains destroyed it whenever they found it up through the end of the 19th century. They were and continue to be ignorant barbarians.
2007-02-12 16:58:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Read the question... look at the avatar.... laugh hard!!! I'm assuming you're having a laugh here and I found it amusing given the context of everything. If that wasn't your original intent, at least you made someone smile :-D
2007-02-12 16:39:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Porterhouse 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Gods alter ego...it was a cosmic joke or a test of faith.
2007-02-12 16:40:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by chuck 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
to what end, seems a bit pointless to me, crafting a believable multi-layered illusion that the world is billions of years old, what's the motivation
2007-02-12 16:35:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I confess. I did it. I left all of those old dinosaur bones and Neanderthal skulls around to confuse people. Now you know.
2007-02-12 16:36:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
3⤊
2⤋