42
2007-02-12 15:44:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Matt 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Generally speaking the causative factors are rather unsusceptible of detection due to the paucity of contextual information from which an inference may be drawn.
2007-02-12 15:46:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because
2007-02-12 15:44:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jesus Freak 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
because.
the answer is not "why not" since you cannot really agure the negative. Because is much more suited in this case since you're offering an answer, something alot more substancial then the mere "why not".
2007-02-12 15:44:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by YannDumont 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because SOMEONE just had to leave the lid all oily and I couldn't open the jar of awesome.
2007-02-12 15:43:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by STFU Dude 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
in Job it says not to question GOD " were you there when i placed the stars in the sky andlaid the foundation of the earth separated the land from the sea? who art thou Oh mortal man to question my wisdom."
hope thhat helps
2007-02-12 15:48:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by jmwaffle420 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have no idea.
I'm just glad to see you back here (if this is the original Laptop Jesus in another incarnation).
2007-02-12 16:50:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Praise Singer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because I said so!
2007-02-12 15:50:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the penguin was looking for you the other day!
2007-02-12 15:48:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because I SAID SO
2007-02-12 15:43:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by RiverGirl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋