This book has been written to make this fact known to people. Since its first publication, originally in Turkey and then in many other countries, millions of people have read and appreciated the book. In addition to Turkish, it has been printed in English, German, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Chinese, Bosnian, Arabic, Albanian, Urdu, Malay and Indonesian. (The text of the book is freely available in all these languages at www.evolutiondeceit.com )
The impact of The Evolution Deceit has been acknowledged by standard-bearers of the opposing view. Harun Yahya was the subject of a New Scientist article called "Burning Darwin". This leading popular Darwinist periodical noted in its 22 April 2000 issue that Harun Yahya "is an international hero" sharing its concern that his books "have spread everywhere in the Islamic world."
2007-02-12 15:30:22 · 15 answers · asked by S_M 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Science, the leading periodical of the general scientific community, emphasized the impact and sophistication of Harun Yahya's works. The Science article "Creationism Takes Root Where Europe, Asia Meet", dated 18 May 2001, observed that in Turkey "sophisticated books such as The Evolution Deceit and The Dark Face of Darwinism... have become more influential than textbooks in certain parts of the country". The reporter then goes on to assess Harun Yahya's work, which has initiated "one of the world's strongest anti-evolution movements outside of North America".
2007-02-12 15:31:10 · update #1
Although such evolutionist periodicals note the impact of The Evolution Deceit, they do not offer any scientific replies to its arguments.The reason is,of course,that it is simply not possible. The theory of evolution is in complete deadlock, a fact you will discover as you read the following chapters.The book will help you realise that Darwinism is not a scientific theory but a pseudo-scientific dogma upheld in the name of materialist philosophy,despite counter evidence and outright refutation.
It is our hope that The Evolution Deceit will for a long time continue its contribution towards the refutation of materialist-Darwinist dogma which has been misleading humanity since the 19th century.And it will remind people of the crucial facts of our lives, such as how we came into being and what our duties to our Creator are.
PDF format:
http://fs.harunyahya.net/popup/Download.php?WorkNumber=462&Format=pdf
=* FOR ANY HELP FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL ME ON *=
smiling4ever222@hotmail.com
2007-02-12 15:31:22 · update #2
You cannot be serious! Please read more about the studies in this book before you start saying it is a "deadlock" fight with evolution. I can't believe there are actually people out there who still don't believe in evolution!?!? where did you go to school?
2007-02-20 02:26:29 · answer #1 · answered by Big Guy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a mentality in liberal America of, "do not confuse technological know-how with details opposite to our schedule." It's going down within the notion of "guy-brought on" international warming. By embracing evolution as confirmed, indeniable, truth, socialist's (liberals) schedule of an all out assault upon Christianity is more desirable. Agenda pushed "technological know-how" has no curiosity in something that detracts from their "reality." We are being deceived.
2016-09-05 07:38:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally have only glanced over this book.
First let me say one thing:
I'm not here to annoy anyone or upset anyone by going against their beliefs.
If you wanna believe in evolution then that's your own fault, your our own PROBLEM, and your own SIN. There are a lot of evidence that could possibly support evolution. .and then again there is a lot of evidence that doesn't support evolution. There is no way that the whole just spawned. .if you don't believe me then do your freakin research. If you don't like me or someone else believeing in God then SHOVE IT. Its our own belief. I don't hardly ever challenge what someone believes but when someone says my belifes are garbage. .thats just wrong, ignorant, and inconsiderate. Most evloutionist don't know half of anything about God or the Christian faith. Until you know everything shut up. .then when you do come talk to me about why its false and be able to answer any questions i have to prove its false.
Many people say that Christians believe in God because they are scared of death. No I'm not scared of death, nor do i know anyone around me who is. I'm not scared of the "void" beyond death. I'm not scared and using the "i don't believe in God because i don't want people to think i'm scared of the 'void' " is one STUPID excuse to say God isn't there.
Its gunna suck living your life as if there isn't a God and find out in the end that there was one all along.
Evloutionist can't give a scientific reply to this book because they are scared they are wrong. They are afraid that their reply will be the garbage instead of the book. They use material information to "prove" their CLAIMS and when they can't find any they get afraid they are wrong. They don't want to be proven wrong so they don't want to say something stupid and prove themselves to all be arrogant.
Lastly I want to say this:
Let everyone believe what they WANT TO BELIEVE. If you have a problem with what someone else believes then go cry to your test tubes or ask God to help them. Just hush and LIVE YOUR OWN LIFE.
2007-02-20 13:28:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I couldn't very well reply to this question and call the book garbage without perusing it a bit, could I? And sure enough, it only took me a few minutes to find this line, a shining example of garbage:
"Believing in Darwin's prophecy, evolutionist paleontologists have been digging up fossils and searching for missing links all over the world since the middle of the 19th century. Despite their best efforts, no transitional forms have yet been uncovered."
Ever hear of Archaeopterix? Or Eohippus, Mesohippus or Merychippus? Do you want me to dig out my paleontology book and find some more?
2007-02-12 15:59:32 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The focus of Science's(the journal) examination appears to be the fallabillity of the generalized public in countries of predominantly lower educated population.
What this study reveals is that when a complex theory presents itself to this population that cannot fully understand the tenets of the theory but matches up closely with what they WANT to believe will then accept that philosophy without any hard data to corroborate their claims.
2007-02-12 15:43:13 · answer #5 · answered by special-chemical-x 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not a question. Prosletyzing. And the Evolution Deceit book is nonsense with no scientific basis and does not warrant a studious response.
2007-02-12 15:38:34 · answer #6 · answered by Skeff 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because the guy who wrote that is an idiot. He doesn't use real arguments. He applies false science and pretends it is an argument. In order to reply to his book, scientists would first have to accept false science. Basically, he uses straw man arguments. He is also a Holocaust denier, so we when how sane he is. Please go read a book from a scientists, you know, those dudes who put people in space. And stop reading books from religious-nut, anti-Semitic people.
2007-02-13 03:07:45 · answer #7 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
These questions from "Harun" are becoming tiring. I wonder if it was you or yahoo answers that deleted your previous questions.
Why do you think S_M ? oppression though zionism, intervention from the freemasons, they ARE out to get you!
Strap on your tinfoil hat and start practising your drooling, your age is nigh! Viva la creationist!
2007-02-18 09:36:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I saw a similar book once, Evolution, the Great Lie. Cracked me up. Actually, I have never forgotten the person who had the book and I lost some respect for her when I saw it.
2007-02-12 15:37:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
How can someone offer a scientific reply to a work of fiction???
2007-02-12 15:36:01 · answer #10 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋