English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

680 ad: All jews in Arabian were wiped-out. Jewish tribes once flourished in the region. Several hundred thosand by sword alone.

1000 ad: As many as 1 billion Hindus, over a couple hundred year span, were butchered in historys greatest genocide, the "Arab Muslim Invasions of India".

1900: Aramian genocide. 1.5 million by turkish muslims BEFORE the young turks.

1950: India, 15 million hindus, many burned alive.

Does this reflect on Islam? But for Islam, would these Jihadists followed a duty of Jihad? Each and everyone of these horrors was fueled by Islamic doctrines. If those doctrines didnt exists, would these events have occured?

Take the hindus of that time...they NEVER invaded any other country or people. They had doctrines of PACIFISM and thus, we can see how their doctrines INFLUENCED THEM. Without Jihad doctrines, do you have Jihad? Without Islam, do you have Jihad? Isnt the problem....ISLAM itself...HELLO MCFLY...IS IT NOT?

2007-02-12 11:50:14 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

Mohammed was street thug who murdered to get what he wanted, His"holy" book tells at least 7 places to kill all who won't convert to Islam. Islam is a religion of conversion by violence. History tells us so again and again. And for everyone who goes on about the crusades, They happened because muslims murdered Christian and Jewish people in Jeruslahem. And, NO Islam was not there first, They simply went and did what their book told them to, They murdered.

2007-02-12 19:09:12 · answer #1 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 0 0

1. Jews in Arabia fought and died in wars.

2. Arab muslims? LOL Mughals were Mongol. Am sure you KNEW THAT!

3. Armenian genocide is a very serious allegation that has been refuted by authentic government papers from the Ottoman Empire time. Their deaths were due to the order of the Ottoman empire to remove all Armenians from Turkey to southern lands because they were fighting along side the Russians within the Ottoman empire and were riling up people against the Ottoman rule. The Ottomans warned them much and finally decided to deport them when they saw no other way out.

4. 1950 india was a result of ethnic conflict. Many people died on both sides.

2007-02-12 12:03:18 · answer #2 · answered by Antares 6 · 0 0

Its never ok to blame islam for anything. Its just not PC. If 99/100 opressive governments were islamic, people would still say its not islam. No matter how many die because of religious cleansing in darfur or iraq or gaza or kashmir due to the hands of people who are muslims you still cant blame islam. Thats the genius of it. Since its a religion you have to respect it unlike Nazism which had the same goal of world domination and killing those with different beliefs. Even if they nuke washington DC its not ok to think islam is the problem.

2016-05-24 02:59:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You know, if this were strictly a Q and A forum, it would be a lot more pleasant. It is very easy for anybody to come in here and recite all sorts of facts to embarrass any religion at all. If you state what belief system you have, I am sure we could find a long list of atrocities committed by people who claim to share your belief system. But is that useful?
Seems more like soap-box speech-making to me.
You might find it interesting to set up a web-page with a forum for the purpose of bashing any belief system (religion, non-religion, whatever), and everybody who likes to do that could go in there, get up on their soap-boxes, and give out all these important facts wo we'll all know about it.

2007-02-12 11:56:14 · answer #4 · answered by Mr Ed 7 · 2 0

If your gonna ask about the actions of extremists, say extremists, there is no such word as islamists, thats a word that the media created. You dont see ppl callin all those americans back in the days who killed native americans, and gave them diseases "Americanists" or Christianists, people who do these crazy things are known and should be known as extremists or terrorists. Dont label them as islamists, cuz it clearly states in the quran "If you kill one innocent of mankind its as though u killed all mankind"

2007-02-12 11:55:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

When Mohammad introduced organized Religion to his nomadic brothers, little did he know that they would carry their old traditions along.
Revenge and killing is part of the ancient nomadic Arabic tradition.

2007-02-12 12:06:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Does killing 498,000,000 american indian reflect on chrisitanity or is christianity seperate from that.

What about 6,000,000 in germany.

100's of thousands of deaths in the crusade.

same during the time of slavery.

if you add up all the american indian deaths alone which is 498,000,000 it is way higher than the numbers your showing combined.

2007-02-12 11:54:22 · answer #7 · answered by DBznut 4 · 4 0

those people rnt jihadists. muslims rnt allowed to kill unless in self defense

2007-02-12 12:17:20 · answer #8 · answered by imputh 5 · 0 0

all ur lies been debunked 100 times one by one

we get ur message of hate------and that u want us to support the zionist criminal regime of israel

2007-02-12 11:57:17 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers