English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think that Bush is aware of the irony of our trying to make the case that Iran is fueling the insurgency while burdened with the lack of credibility that the US suffers as a result of Bush's having cooked the intel on Iraq's WMD's?

2007-02-12 11:19:47 · 17 answers · asked by Concerned Citizen 3 in Politics & Government Military

17 answers

Do you think Bill Clinton ever read Pinnochio?

2007-02-12 11:23:39 · answer #1 · answered by pretender59321 6 · 3 2

Yes, I'm sure President Bush read "The Boy Who Cried Wolf".If you want to be educated google these words: Iraq chemical weapons factory. You will learn that we found WMD in Iraq. Do you want to be educated or just keep hating President Bush?
As for US credibility, tell it to Saddam when you meet him. Since you are lying about President Bush and I've also seen you lie about the NRA in one of your answers to a question, I expect you and Saddam might end up meeting and have lots of time to chat about how you both wish you had treated Bush better, and told the truth...

2007-02-12 15:03:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is getting so old. If people love and respect Iran, Iraq, N. Korea, Afganastan and what they have done to innocent people then you are way worse than Bush. Get a clue and stand by something that is true. We need to address the World Leaders that murder the innocent. I respect what Bush has done. Remember Bush was thrown into this by 911. Do you remember the day of 911???? Did you forget?????? It IS a world problem not just isolated to the Taliban...get a clue...They woke up a sleeping Giant and you are either with us or Against us. Remember. Maybe you and the blind can be against us...

2007-02-12 11:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by fastfreedombailbonds 4 · 0 1

The Dubai Ports deal did backfire on Bush, since he kept preaching about terrorists coming to get us.

Anyways, Iran might be fueling the insurgency. The problem with the evidence the U.S. has is that the evidence could be easily planted to make it look like Iran is fueling the insurgency. Whether or not Iran is fueling the insurgency shouldn't matter, because we shouldn't be in Iraq in the first place.

2007-02-12 11:25:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Do you people thinnk that parroting the fake intel line it will become true? The intelligence on the WMD's came from an Intelligence Agency that had been gutted during the Clinton experience. There were very few real human assets left in the middle east at the time. We also recieved info from the Brits and Israelis that confirmed the findings of our own intelligence. There were at least 10 reasons spelled out by Colin Powel in front of the UN as reason that Saddam needed dealt with, the WMD issue being one of them. Its over move forward please.

2007-02-12 11:25:34 · answer #5 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 3 1

I think George is doing the best he can considering 911, what did everyone do forget already, or are they just making attempts for political gain themselves? We need to support George and each other, otherwise we might as well go right back to sleep.

2007-02-12 11:41:01 · answer #6 · answered by 5-Stars 3 · 0 0

The WMD's are in Syria or under al Queda control somewhere else, and isn't it better that we go in and oust Hussein now rather than wait for him to get and use them. And continue to torture his people. And violate UN sanctions.

2007-02-12 11:27:09 · answer #7 · answered by bigsey93harrison37 3 · 1 1

god you liberals post the same thing over and over and over.....first al qaeda is the insurgency...iran is aiding them and thats what bob gates is telling you if you would listen. what lack of credibility, we are enforcing a sanction the un refused to. and if you wouldve bothered to read richard butlers report from the un wmds were found...you can read the answer on the several other identical questions the pelosi....ites have posted or check wilkopedia...man i wish you liberals would get a fact checker.
oh and by the way....speaking of lack of credibility...lets compare apples to apples...your last liberal president was guilty of....

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
and you want to compare bush to that...yeah right.LMFAO.
you keep dreaming.

2007-02-12 11:27:09 · answer #8 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 1

Did Al Gore read it, that's the question. After Teflon birds, Monsanto butterflies and Patagonian sheep, the self-styled "greens" are lucky I am even willing to entertain anything they have to say.

2007-02-12 11:25:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I think even if he had read the boy who cried wolf he would find it beyond his intellect, he'd have to take it to his vice president and say "W-w-what what does this m-m-m-mean mean?"

2007-02-12 11:28:07 · answer #10 · answered by kaqu007 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers