maybe not the reactors but internation power lines like the one in Manitoba-North Dakota and eventually they should not charge for it once built.
2007-02-12 10:03:10 · 7 answers · asked by I AM=iam 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
If Iran simply wanted nuclear power then they would have been _given_ nuclear power plants.
Of course you don't need weapons grade uranium to generate electricity so people are suspicious.
2007-02-12 10:43:18 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are ways, as far as I know, for a nation to have a nuclear power plant run by outside forces. For example, a nation deemed to be dangerous, can pay for a reactor to be run by, lets say, the UN. But the country would have no control over it, just get the power.
2007-02-12 10:08:00 · answer #2 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear power could be used for offensive weapons too.
What would Adolph Hitler done with nukes?
2007-02-12 10:07:20 · answer #3 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm assuming this is a comment about Iran...
However, the Russians offered them exactly what you are saying and they flatly rejected the offer.
2007-02-12 10:47:41 · answer #4 · answered by futuregopprez 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one is saying no to that. The issue is what some nations decide to do with their "neucular" capabilities.
2007-02-12 10:08:49 · answer #5 · answered by JiveSly 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear power yes! bombs and weapons???
2007-02-12 10:08:23 · answer #6 · answered by Leroy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
noo one should
2007-02-12 10:08:34 · answer #7 · answered by goldfreeblue 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋