Please explain your answer.
2007-02-12 09:54:05 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Nope. It should be taught in Folklore courses.
2007-02-12 09:57:10 · answer #1 · answered by Not so looney afterall 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Intelligent design is not an alternative to evolution. Not scientifically. It never will be. Why? Because intelligent design is not a theory in and of itself. Its basically evolution, plus a creator. There is absolutely no evidence to back this idea up. In fact, the only thing you could really say regarding intelligent design would be one sentence added to the curriculum: "Some people think that a god/deity designed this process." Period. What's the point?
Science classes are intended to educate kids on scientifically backed, accepted, and proven ideas. If you believe differently, its your responsibility as a parent to enlighten your children.
This country was founded on the basis that we should all have the freedom to believe anyway we choose -- even if that means not at all. Lets keep the original morals of this country intact, shall we?
2007-02-12 18:03:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No. It is a theory that is not based on scientific facts. Courses taught in public schools need to be based on theories or ideas strongly based on scientific facts, supported by credible experts. The only "experts" backing Intelligent Design up are "Christian Scientists," and I think most university professors would agree that they are not credible.
Besides, public schools are open to children of every faith and credence. Even if there's only one kid in the entire school who doesn't believe in God, or comes from a different faith, it is the state's responsibility to make sure her beliefs aren't impinged upon.
When will Christian's realize that not everyone believes in God, or needs God to have a fulfilling life?
2007-02-12 18:01:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It shouldn't be taught in science classes because it isn't science. That is a purely objective statement of fact, intelligent design is not science.
2007-02-13 08:21:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Please, I would love to learn about it in school. As a kid in school we were always taught about evolution. And I always argued with my teacher when taking the test on the unit if I could answer with my own opinions, she yelled at me and told me to do it her way or to not even bother at all. When teaching one day (still about evolution) I walked out of the classroom, she yelled at me to come back or to leave her class for good, so that is exactly what I did. She ended up being fired for religious discrimination. We don't have to listen to the evolution babble, it goes against some peoples' beliefs, and they should have the same right if ever Intelligent design was being taught. But schools need to teach both. I wish I could go more into depth but I can't find the right words. I really hope I helped. Take care.
2007-02-12 18:16:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Never. School is a place for fact. Science class is a place for science. Its not the place for religion or philosophy. You have church for religion, so keep it there.
Not only that, but if you're teaching Intelligent Design, then you also need to teach the mythology of all the other religions in the world because not everyone is Christian.
Just keep your religion where it belongs. In your place of worship. You'll save everyone alot of trouble, yourself included.
2007-02-12 17:58:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
If the idiotic delusion of "Intelligent Design" should be taught in science classes, then the stork should be taught in pediatrics and the tooth fairy taught in dental schools.
Additional:
"Paladin", my answer isn't an original, it's simply one that bears repeating. If I were to give my own words, it would be censored by yahoo.
One point worth mentioning is that "liberal and activist" judge John E. Jones who didn't think the idiotic delusion of "Intelligent Design" should be taught in schools. That's what happens when you get a "liberal and activist" president like Bush appointing judges like Jones. The judge also belongs to a "liberal and activist" church and that "liberal and activist" Republican party.
http://www.thelutheran.org/article/article.cfm?article_id=6096&key=37161214
How DARE he put the US constitution ahead of his religious beliefs, especially when he was appointed _because_ of his religious beliefs!
.
2007-02-12 17:59:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
No no NO. It's not science... hence... it doesn't belong in SCIENCE class.
It's pretty much that simple.
And if people are going to talk about FAIR, that it would be only FAIR to include one creation "theory" along with another, they should take the time to realize that evolution ISN'T a creation theory. It does NOT speculate as to the origins of all life or existence.
2007-02-12 17:57:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not. Intelligent Design is not science, it's religion dressed up to look like science. No one was fooled but those who wanted to be.
Brilliant answer, MC Hummer.
2007-02-12 17:58:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't function as a scientific theory, so it shouldn't be taught in science classes.
2007-02-12 17:58:22 · answer #10 · answered by N 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
without a doubt it should be. Because it is the truth.You can see Gods personality in his creation. Read proverbs chapter 8, It explains Jesus role in creation.Also watch some educational TV on animals and earth. Just a few of the Lords designs, the lizard who's tail pops of bouncing around like a fishing lure while he himself is paralyzed. The tiger with the black marks on the ears and tail so its cubs can follow behind. The seed that falls from the tree and spins like a helicopter to the earth. their is so many. I no why Jesus delighted in his fathers creation.
2007-02-12 18:05:33 · answer #11 · answered by chucky 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋