Every day you pick up a newspaper today and there is a shooting here, a killing there. More young people have lost there lives in far greater numbers than in the past. Then we have the military sending innocent boys off to war to be killed. Does the Government realize the valuable resource we have in "KILLERS" existing in our society. Does anyone agree that instead of going to prison where tax payers have to foot the bill as they (killers) lay around most of the day in the pretense of rehabilitation that we should send those persons to the war where they can put their gun loving craft to good use saving some of of innocent youth to become viable members of society? We would still be paying the taxes to support the military but at the same time giving fresh young minds a chance to build families and accentuate society.
2007-02-12 08:00:13 · 10 answers · asked by rasmusicman 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
What is "gun violence?" A gun is an inanimate object. Is "gun violence" similar to, better, or worse than:
car violence
knife violence
rope violence
fist violence
foot violence
brick violence
bat violence
teeth violence
bottle violence
broken glass violence
writing utensil violence
airplane violence
2007-02-12 08:28:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not too smart.
The lust of war has driven many a good man to commit crimes he would never dream of in his everyday life. The men you speak of have no conscience. They would relish the opportunity to kill and torture. These men are psychopaths and sociopaths with a twist. They should not be given weapons under any circumstances.
I agree that something should be done with these men other than internment at the expense of taxes, but my solutions are not socially acceptable in the West.
2007-02-12 08:07:22 · answer #2 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the "Gun Violence" that happens is usually by gangs,accidents or by killers that usually get caught.I disagree with you on the issues of sending the criminals to go to war because they would escape.They would tell the enemy our plans to attack them.Then our plans would be foiled.I believe that when you sing up for the military that you are in the right state of mind and you are 18 years old and you understand all of the contract and try not to go AWOL.I do not believe we are sending them to be killed at all.They are willing to go to protect are country from our enemy's, for your protection and you sit there bashing them for doing this.Have we all forgotten about 9/11? I think you should thank them for doing this,putting there life out there for you and so many millions of people.You are crying because you have to pay taxes if we are still at war.You would have to pay for it if the jailers had to go so what is your problem?
2007-02-12 08:27:39 · answer #3 · answered by LOVE TRAVIS OUTLAW 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
would desire to definitely everyone carry a gun? No, yet specially via fact people who're no longer prepared or no longer able to apply them would not have them. they're greater of a risk to themselves than a help. yet, human beings would desire to have the excellent to hold (with history tests, and so on...). right here in Texas and, greater at present, in Florida, the creation of a hid handgun license (CHL) has decreased violent crime. Rape has fallen 22% and homicide fifty two% in Texas via fact the creation of the CHL. additionally everyone who tells you people who carry weapons (legally) are basically strolling time bombs waiting to circulate off and kill somebody basically would not comprehend their information. the object under, written via a non-partisan group, shows that CHL holders are much less probably to commit crimes than people who do no longer. you will locate comparable information on the internet web site of the Texas branch of Public risk-free practices. For assessment seem at a city like Washington D.C., which has the strictest gun administration rules interior the rustic, has between the optimum homicide costs interior the rustic.
2016-11-03 06:33:29 · answer #4 · answered by speth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least 10% of the people who kill with automobiles (now one every three minutes) should be executed first. Then start thinking what to do about killers using other weapons.
Firearms are quite a way down the list after automobiles, knives, the proverbial blunt instrument, arson and strangulation.
2007-02-12 08:05:51 · answer #5 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Most criminals arn't fit for service. They're too undisciplined and generally criminal. The ones that arn't tend to be ex military anyway, the ones that can't function in normal society and deliberatly commit crime with the intent of imprisonment so they can get 3 sqaure meals.
2007-02-12 08:07:21 · answer #6 · answered by malaysniper 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Love your theory, but since most gun killings involve drug related BS, they are doing a pretty good job at cleaning up after themselves anyway and most of them are to Chicken Sh;t to stare down anyone other than an unarmed woman or child.
2007-02-12 08:04:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problems is not the guns but those who pull the trigger.
We should be spending time and effort to teach our kids moral instead of trying to be the kids buddy.
Or have two parent income homes so they can have all the toys.
2007-02-12 08:12:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Billy the kid was 13 when he started killing. We aren't becoming more violent. Just more sensitive to violence.
2007-02-12 08:14:22 · answer #9 · answered by Coyote81 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guns kill people like a spoons make fat people fat.
2007-02-12 08:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by jasonzbtzl 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋