Will USA attack Iran next & then Syria?

Question

reason Iran: prevent nuclear weapon

reason Syria: Saddams weapons were moved there

Answer 1

We'd need more reasons than just that - but there a lot more reasons than those.

Yes, Saddams weapons were moved to Syria and there's a fair amount of documentation - including testimony by Republican Guards officers who transported them - showing it. Those who claim 'Saddam never had WMD' are so ignorant as to defy description. Ask the Kurds about those non-existant chemical weapons, or the several hundred they've found, including the one just used in an IED attack (agent failed to disperse).

Syria and Iran are the prime sponsors of terror in Iraq right now, supplying fighters and weapons and cash. Iran is trying to get nuclear weapons, which is a huge threat since President Ammendijad has said several times he thinks it's his destiny to destroy Israel...

Anyway, I've attached some links for you to read on the possibilities in those areas.

Hope that helps...

Orion

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

Possibly !! But not for the reason you have mentioned (though Apparently He would say this ) But actualy he wants to get hold on Middle east Oil resources....... Iran stands 3rd for its oil resources !

But it would not happen that soon as US is too busy in Iraq and Afghanistan to afford an other expedition to Iran ! Though they are on their way in planning !

Prevent nuclear weapon? LOL, and this time the Biggist nuclear power in the world is USA itself .......How cute !!

And Bush could not prove that Iraq has some weapons so no question of moving it to syria !

But Bush doesn't care that the world is very much aware about it !

Answer 4

It's highly possible. If the USA can find a good excuse this time because both Iranians and Arabs do not have these kind of weapons but they Iranians can trade them with the Russians and the Russians are supported by the Chinese. So if the USA attacks middle east again it will be the beginning of a world war. I don't know if Europe participates because in this continent we are all pissed off with these stupid wars. Actually I don't believe that any normal and moral person in this planet would like this.

Answer 5

I don’t know about the oil. But the money has certainly ran out. The Dollar is a joke these days. It’s unaffordable. If they do invade another country, it might even become a sound financial strategy to change your Dollars into Rubbles, Yen, or whatever currency you can find. Can you imagine, money might actually end up saving the world this time!!

Answer 6

The purpose of the Iraq war was to get Bush reelected and secure the oil supply for the rich oil people. In 1965 I saw a new prototype vehicle at the US Army Transportation Center/School that used water for fuel. It was to be the new vehicle for all of our military services, but it would have ruined things for the rich oil people so it was hidden. If people quit buying vehicles that use gas, we will not need to destroy our country by going to war. We will be energy independent. Until then drive 55 mph, accelerate slower, and coast to slow rather than going from gas to brake pedal. That will save 15.6% on fuel and over 10,000 lives each year.

Answer 7

You fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

While I wasn't fooled by Bush's little spiel on WMD in Iraq in the first place, many people in this country WERE. As it was, I didn't care so much whether or not he HAD WMD, I just thought that we shouldn't try to fight so many wars on so many fronts because, after all, history has shown that it tears a country to shreds.

I say this again with Iran: yes, their leader may (or may not, we don't live there) be crazy, yes, they might be enriching uranium for weapons (though we don't have proof of that either), but AS IT STANDS AS OF TODAY, he has not spoken of attacking the U.S. All he HAS said is that if WE attack them, they'll hit back. Would we do any different?

I say that we, as people, try to convince the American government to come to the table with Iran and try to make some sort of peace. REGARDLESS of whether they seem the enemy, it is always better to keep your friends close and enemies closer. But if we allow ourselves to be fooled again, we will find our country DESTROYED by the unease and unhappiness, and general animosity that the people have for the government's willingness to send yet more Americans to their death.

Answer 8

You forgot North Korea, can't be leaving them out if we discussing nuking some place to prevent nuclear war.

Answer 9

That is how I would go, but there are more moderate voices in Iran. Given time, they may rise up and remove Ahmedinejad and take a more moderate stance that opens them up to diplomacy.

Syria must be dealt with.

Answer 10

i do no longer think of so. 1st of all judging of the cartoons Powell confirmed on the UN the secret centers of the States is a humorous tale. Mosad's brokers are greater able. yet i think of additionally that when returned israel bombed bedwins and camels. you will desire to chill out however...solid dogs you're...