I think this two countries should send more troups, may be Spain and Italy should suport my proposal also. If these countries are our allies - please give us a break - lets bring our boys home - and send theirs. Then it will be proven they are our real allies. I am not talking about 1000 here and 500 there - I am talking about these 20,000 additonal troops we are sending. Your constructive opinions are welcome. Peace be fallen on us....not war.
2007-02-12 05:42:26 · 9 answers · asked by Be-hive Baaaby 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Sorry for typo - it should be Troops not Troups..
2007-02-12 05:47:02 · update #1
No I don't think Australia should send more troops. They are trying to find a face saving way to bring their troops home, also
Spain pulled it's troups out after the Madrid bombing remember
How selfish you are to ask for others to send more troops so you can bring troops home.
In matters like this there is no such thing as a"Break", it's war remember.
You guys made the mess now you want others to clean it up. Fat Chance
2007-02-12 06:06:00 · answer #1 · answered by Murray H 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
10. Ava, Evie or Mia- Evie 9. Lily, Amelia or Chloe- Lily 8. Emily, Lily or Abigail- Lily 7. Ella, Jessica or Madison- Ella 6. Charlotte, Grace or Emily- Charlotte 5. Isabella, Emily or Ava- Ava 4. Ruby, Chloe or Sophia- Chloe 3. Chloe, Sophie or Olivia- Olivia 2. Mia, Ruby or Emma- Emma a million. Olivia, Olivia or Isabella- Olivia 10. Lucas, Daniel or Anthony- Lucas 9. Noah, James or Noah- Noah 8. Ethan, William or Jayden- Ethan 7. James, Joshua or Daniel- Daniel 6. Lachlan, Thomas or Joshua- Thomas 5. Thomas, Alfie or William- Thomas 4. Joshua, Harry or Alexander- Harry 3. Oliver, Charlie or Michael- Charlie! 2. Jack, Oliver or Ethan- Ethan a million. William, Jack or Jacob- Jacob
2016-10-17 06:42:53 · answer #2 · answered by rothi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Australia, UK, and USA have all been either attacked by Muslim terrorists or have severe politcal/social problems with Muslims in their own countries. All have a clear reason why their armies should be in Iraq fighting the common enemy. I don't understand why UK, Austrailia, India, and Israel aren't in with us more heavily.
2007-02-12 06:02:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think they should not let innocent men suffer for a bastard cause. Especially one that was born by sheer force and agression on the part of the United States.
2007-02-12 05:49:46 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes...but it won't happen..
Hell we can't even get the Nato forces to step up in Afghanistan.
So we're pretty much alone.
Which is fine..Next time Germany tries to take Europe.. I say we let em.
2007-02-12 05:51:36 · answer #5 · answered by . 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. The Iraqis should step up and start getting killed to control Iraq.
2007-02-12 05:48:00 · answer #6 · answered by Sarge1572 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
NO you started it you finish it we should never have followed your idiot president trying to grab more oil for your greedy country.
2007-02-12 09:48:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Regardless of your opinions on if it was a good decision or not, it's our fight.
2007-02-12 05:46:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I guess they are not as stupid as US and its administrators
2007-02-12 05:46:14 · answer #9 · answered by Jagan Mohan R 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋