WHAT IN THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?? NOAH HAD CHILDREN, WHO HAD CHILDREN AND THEY SPREAD ALL OVER THE WORLD.
2007-02-12 05:11:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Monica L. 1
·
3⤊
12⤋
There are a lot of things you could ask Creationists about why they don't accept certain or all aspects of Evolutionism. Why have certain species become extinct if God created them to be perfect? You know, stuff like that..
Some of the religious people I know study biology very precisely, but they accept it to be all just a theory of science. It was only recently that the Catholic Church finally accepted the concept of DNA. Even though I believe in Evolutionism because the evidence is just so much more substantial, as far as I know, religion is a lot more deeply rooted than the newness of Evolutionism. You can't expect someone who's been raised to deeply believe in Creationism to throw it all away because one day they suddenly hear that the Bible is all baloney.
The only thing I have a problem with are the people who know nothing except their own cultures and beliefs and just blow off anything that doesn't agree with them. Maybe it's because I've lived in California almost my entire life, but sometimes I'm just amazed when a follower of a different set of beliefs gets attacked even in the most passive of ways.
Oh and the way your question is worded, I think some people think that .. you are a Creationist.
2007-02-12 05:29:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Emilie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
What is your point? That monkeys in SA evolved from the first cell ever in SA and those in Africa from the first cell ever in Africa? This is not correct, monkeys from SA are relatives to those from Africa and they both have same anchestors somewhere back in time. The fact is that some monkeys of their common ancestors managed to get from the one continent to the other somehow(Pangea, people traveling-yes there were people travelling across the oceans back in 10000 or more years ago,etc). Their dissimilarities, taking into account the dissimilarities of their enviroments, show how back their common ancestor is.
2007-02-12 05:26:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by costasgr43 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Youtube have fairly some! attempt 'besides the fact that It Takes' or 'She's All That', the two intense college youngster comedies from the previous due 90s or early 00s. or you would be able to desire to attempt '17 returned' (Zac Efron youngster intense college comedy) or 'basic A' (very humorous youngster intense college comedy made at present). there is likewise a pair of Hugh grant comedies: Notting Hill, Bridget Jones' Diary. Youtube additionally has Edward Scissorhands, which you will have already considered, seeing as you like Tim Burton. yet in case you haven't any longer, watch it! you will like it. wish that facilitates.
2016-11-03 06:11:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why the hell are there humans and other mammals there, too? If they weren't already there before the split in continents, they migrated via the ice-bridge between Alaska and The Motherland: The Former Soviet Union.
2007-02-12 05:29:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
From a creationist point of view this question would be easy to answer. They crossed the land bridge connecting Siberia to Alaska. That may not be the correct answer but it is an answer a creationist could give.
2007-02-12 05:13:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Geoff 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Why are there humans in South America and Africa? I believe they got there the same way.
2007-02-12 05:30:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
On the topic of creationism and evolution, I believe in evolution based on the evidence, but I also believe that God created the universe the way he did so that it would evolve. F*** Adam and Eve. F*** everything only being around for a little more than 6,000 years. But that doesn't dismiss God either, just religion.
2007-02-12 05:14:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ledge 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
As far as I know African and S America were originally joined...look at an atlas...read up on some material before you post questions like this. Science can prove that both continents are still moving.
2007-02-12 05:11:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
The distribution of all animals that survived the flood happened the same way, by migration in whatever means available.
2007-02-12 05:21:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jay Z 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The world was once a single large continent (called Pangea).
I'm not a creationist by the way, I despise them.
2007-02-12 05:11:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋