This is to big to cut and paste, or else I would have. Please go to the site below to review.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54131
2007-02-12 03:26:46 · 12 answers · asked by Gardener for God(dmd) 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hi , I read some of this as you suggested and I think that sits somewhere between science and faith, neither one or the other.
It is at least quite positive for creationist belief but I cannot accept the fact that the Holy Spirit is in fact electric energy as it seems to suggest, this somehow makes God less of an omnipotent God and more of a sci-fi energy force.
I cannot ever see the time happening when science can explain God, this is suggestive than God can be fully fathomed by mere mortals.
2007-02-12 03:37:57 · answer #1 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First off he statrs off with the assumtion there is an all power ful being called God. Then he reduces him down to a magnetic field. Then he basically just attributes everything to him. He finished by saying "people need something to believe in" (paraphrase).
This is just con men who claim to be scientists using scientific terms to look like they're doing something scientific when it's clearly not.
2007-02-12 03:35:01 · answer #2 · answered by adphllps 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Blah. Since there can never be definitive PROOF of a FAITH-based religious figure, what's the point of going to the link? Flawed logic, bad science or pure conjecture are the norm for "proof" of God's existence.
2007-02-12 03:32:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Thank you for the link. To anybody who hasn't read it, just read the opening paragraph to get a good flavour of it:
"A science student in Kentucky says when the Bible records God spoke, and things were created, that's just what happened, and he can support that with scientific experiments."
It's absolutely hilarious.
2007-02-12 03:54:06 · answer #4 · answered by The Truth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I cant believe you actually expect people to read all that nonsense. Scientific experimenting true but none of it proves what it is supposed to prove that anything can be created by it. In fact nothing was created by it. Just a bunch of nonsense that proves nothing. If you are going to prove something your experiment has to live up to its proof.
2007-02-12 03:38:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
there was no proof in that article. it said there is light so there must be a god. well there is also dark, what does that mean? reatrds that believe in anything that a pompous preacher belches out deserve to remain ignorant. Now be a good retard and go off and enjoy your NASCAR races and wrestling heroes.
2007-02-12 03:34:48 · answer #6 · answered by Nick C 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I find it interesting but I already believed in the devine creator without a doctrine or bible for he guides me and answers my prayers and i am here
2007-02-12 03:34:26 · answer #7 · answered by woodsonhannon53 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the article just claims somebody "proved" it. it does not actually provide any proof. so it's not worth thinking about - or asking about.
2007-02-12 03:33:32 · answer #8 · answered by eldad9 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
VERY interesting.
Someone posted here about vibrations and sounds and God.
†
2007-02-12 03:37:00 · answer #9 · answered by Jeanmarie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Provide a summary at least. If you're too lazy to type, I'm too lazy to read.
2007-02-12 03:29:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋