English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Germany.... after all they started both WW1 and WW2.

2007-02-12 01:25:28 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Christ June R... not another bra burning feminist... stop offering wild opinions of your own woman!

2007-02-12 01:34:00 · update #1

14 answers

Yep, you better watch us! We're just waiting for the troops to return. Can't just take over without a good, old fight first. But if Iran kicks off now, it will be years before there will be an army over here we could challenge... ;)

2007-02-12 01:54:02 · answer #1 · answered by Hipira 3 · 0 1

Germany cannot be easily ruled out of contention for the cause of third world war. Their past antecedents put them among the likely sources where troubles leading to third world war could start. Just imagine a Germany of today attacking Israel. It would be devastating. They have the best economy in Europe. They manufacture some of the best sub-marines including some of the ones in use in Israel and other parts of the world. They have become a power to be reckoned with in world politics and diplomacy today. And they have not forgotten so fast how they humuliated from the two wars and what is not certain is whether they are remorse enough not to start another one.

But apart from Germany, the middle east seems to be the continent that would produce the next world war antagonists. With their riches from oil and the west's readiness to provide them with virtually everything they need (including military hardwares) they seems to be the next continent where the third world war may likely start. They would never compromise their stand on Islam and they would never stop until they at least root out the western domination in their economy and social life.

This people are regarded as unintelligent and docile, but recent events have proved this position wrong. They are now taking up challenges and are trying to have their destinies in their hands. They are producing some fine scientists in Engineering and science, which is core to achieving this objective.

And think of this the west sold to them most of their military hardwares, they have in some cases tried successfully and copied some of this equipments and are gradually manufacturing some and running routine maintenance on most of them without due consultation from the west. In the next few years they may be able to come up with a breakthrough technology either at par with the west or surpacing them.

2007-02-12 03:04:50 · answer #2 · answered by MAFOKOCHIZHI 2 · 0 1

Germany started two wars out of how many hundreds of wars over the years. But if you look you will see that there has been a war going on at all times for more than a hundred years in the mid east. Some one is always fighting someone over there. Also if you are a Christian(i am not) your Bible says armageddon will start in the mid east but I am off the opinion that we are not yet at that stage and there is no proof that WW3 would be the war that starts armageddon anyway. But that is one reason why people think it will be started over there. Also Iran having nuclear capabilty is very scary and should scaring the .... out of everyone the world over.

2007-02-12 01:38:35 · answer #3 · answered by elaeblue 7 · 2 1

A World War on the scale of I or II is only likely with two power groups. Today the only think aproaching such power groups is the secular world and Islam. So I think the Middle East as a starting point is the best bet. However in the long term. North America vs Central and South is worth watching.

2007-02-12 01:30:52 · answer #4 · answered by oldhippypaul 6 · 3 1

It was actually Austro-Hungary who initially declared war on Serbia in ww1. Germany merely intervened on the side of Austro-Hungary, and the allies intervened on the side of Serbia Depending on your line of thought you could say the allies had a little responsibility for ww2. If they had stood up to Hitler when he invaded Czechoslovakia in 1938 in accordance with various treaties, Hitler may have backed down

2007-02-12 05:56:03 · answer #5 · answered by vdv_desantnik 6 · 0 0

The middle east may seem like a good starting point for a nuclear war. but id put my money on one starting between India and Pakistan! the animosity between the two counties often ends up in military exchanges..

2007-02-12 04:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by robert x 7 · 0 0

the shown undeniable reality that Obama needs to speak with Iran is in all probability between the necessary causes i'm so supportive of him. i'm a non-partisan voter in the different case, besides the undeniable fact that it is a key disadvantage I aspect with him on. the reality is, Iran is Iraq's mind-blowing neighbor geographically, economically, and has very tremendous cultural and political implications that diffuse maximum ideal around the border. that is undemanding to educate Iran and Iraq are diverse international locations, besides the undeniable fact that custom, relationships, commerce etc are a lot a lot less constrained through those borders. Iran will oftentimes be a significant interest for any of Iraq's affairs. regardless of if we exclude them from international kin now, in ten, 20 years Iraq will once more beneficial have were given to cope with Iran. Leaving Iran out of the equation will be to Iraq, as Mexico or Canada will be without the U. S.. it is an unrealistic setup that would unavoidably be undone in only a topic of time. hence, I evaluate that is beneficial to contain them in talks now. at the same time as the U. S. maintains to be worried and though acts as a mediator, bypass ahead and paintings in the route of a significantly better eternal decision, even if it way Iran has quite more beneficial impression than we would necessary like. it is an threat for Iran to compromise likewise, or for us to study out to diplomatically decrease between the necessary Iranian authorities's more beneficial extreme insurance regulations. except for, Arab minorities were complaining that they (among diverse minorities) are underrepresented in u . s . of america. I evaluate that electing a black president would help to improve our image of their eyes. concerning Israel and Palestine, a completely diverse disadvantage completely, I evaluate their subject matters are resolvable, besides the undeniable fact that I doubt Obama is the lacking piece. As I see it, the completed international is maximum ideal in the destiny sparkling of peace--if quite anybody would basically upward push up in the destiny with the most ideal perspective. I doubt that lets you take position. yet no longer some thing makes it unbelievable. And already there's a tremendous volume of unreported and underreported strives for peace, solidarity, and cooperation between Israel and Palestine, as in trouble-free terms one get mutually.

2016-12-04 02:05:57 · answer #7 · answered by lemanski 4 · 0 0

germany did not start WWI it was the shooting of franz ferdinand in Sarajevo but rebels, that start the whole war over boundaries in Europe.
WW3 is already running and has been for a while, it just a different format. 2 religions waring, slowly but surely in Isreal, Afghan, Iraq, etc.. Bombings in London, US, Bali, Spain etc... The boundaries of war vary, but its the results and motives that dictate what is or is not a war.

2007-02-12 02:05:18 · answer #8 · answered by dsclimb1 5 · 2 1

I'd have to bet on the middle east also, Germany in not that involved in world politics anymore.

2007-02-12 01:29:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The root cause of WW3, WW1 and WW2 is MAN

The root cause of global warming is also MAN

Buck up your ideas MAN or you may get fired into oblivion!

Wise up to yourselves! You will ask and you will receive!

It's June S not June R although Elizebeth R would have said her two penny worth too no doubt. Get over yourself Dog - MAN is the root cause like it or not!

2007-02-12 01:31:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jewel 6 · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers