should the price of junk food be put up?

Question

and the price of fruit brought down.
it is about 50p for a packet of biscuits which would prob get you 2 bananas.

if fruit and veg didnt cost as much i would definetly buy more.

Answer 1

I wish they would raise the prices . My family are junk food addicts maybe they would give it up if they couldn't afford it.

Answer 2

maybe but,

i personally think that the price of fruit and veg should go down it is expesive and over priced, and it's true that you could prob buy and pack of biscuits for 50p for the same price as 2 bits of fruit.

if the supermarkets have to justify putting the price of fruit and veg down by putting the price of junk food up then so be it.

also i think it wouldn't be so dam easy for kids to buy a pack of crisps if they was to put the price up a bit, even if they was to buy some least they wouldnt be able to buy half a dozen

Answer 3

an similar way the mastercard disclosure statements deter people from mastercard use. on the merchandising device: this stuff will kill you useless as a mackerel. shopper: i ask your self if I actually have 3 quarters? on the mastercard software: we may be able to substitute any area of the deal at any time in any respect we want. shopper: Is that the line I signal in there? you would to boot be talking to a canines or a cat. people now no longer respond to speech. they are aphasic. they have 500 note vocabularies, about one hundred of them are kinds of beer. Any habit no count number how predatory, disgraceful, or deplorable that does no longer rapidly and quite deliver jailtime to the performer of the habit will be done to the optimal earnings plausible. some thing you do not prefer to make certain take position, must be prohibited. no longer warned about in disclosures -- prohibited, so there is jailtime for the perps who do it. and per chance they don't end when I ask them to end after proper identity. that is even more beneficial advantageous. a troublesome rain's a gonna fall. short answer: maximum persons understand what cats and canines understand and little more beneficial. in case you do not want them to eat poison, make poison sales a criminal offense. Sorry to no longer be a very solid Libertarian the following -- yet you understand i can not remember upon to be organic to any ideology. existence trumps liberty in my e book. If the authorities needs to do solid, then it is going to easily do solid -- short line A to B = immediately line. Tax the chips! Why enable people 0.5 kill themselves, and then make quite anybody pay for anybody. If drugs is going to be one tremendous socialism, enable's a minimum of end the self-killers from making it more beneficial expensive for the prudent voters. Tax liquor, cigarettes, trans-fat, fried potato chips, regardless of makes people ill. ill is undesirable. properly is solid. Doing solid == do basically it! If the regulation can not do solid, enable's eliminate it and characteristic anarchy. what's the point of having it? more low priced is more beneficial advantageous, a lot less ill people is more low priced, a lot less people ingesting poisons is way less ill people, and telling people issues is like talking to cats and canines. So, make the regulation paintings as a stress for solid, or basically eliminate it completely.

Answer 4

Fruit prices should come down, but they won't be. Agriculture is a fickle area, and the growers need to make money too. As for junk food, I don't buy any so whether or not expensive or cheap won't bother me a bit. And not all of us like fruit / veggies.

Answer 5

No. That would just mean that the fast food industry profits will sky rocket while the quality would remain the same. It's up to the individual whether they buy healthy food or not, it increasingly seems as though we're living in a nanny state with such ill-thought out ideas as this.

Answer 6

No - this is yet another PC ..PR stunt - probably to put a fast food tax on Mickey D's.... have you seen your local Mickey D's or KFC .Chippie...etc.... the places are mobbed - Joe & Jane public love the so called junk food...we live fast lives nowadays and we want to spend at least time in the kitchen as possible.. and trying to force our kids to eat stuff they dont want to eat is wrong.... think about it - if your parents tried to get you to eat a Carrot & Banana for lunch - instead of what you really wanted - a bag of chips - burger - pizza ..mars bar - coke.. you would have said mmm!! yes please Mummy....dont think so...

Answer 7

I think if people are hooked on junk food, they will pay the price, the same way as with cars, drugs and smoking. It's a matter of education, encouragement and choice.

Answer 8

This would be the wrong approach. The answer is to educate people more strictly as to the dangers of junk food and to ban all advertising of junk food.

Answer 9

yes definately. you need a kind of carrot and stick approach, people will just nto learn they are too stuck in their ways. If you make something more expensive they are less likely to go for it and change their ways. A lot of people only use less electricity because bills went up not because of the environment

Answer 10

No. People need to start taking responsibility for their actions. Education needs to include nutrition information so people learn to make better choices.