Iraq has a democratically elected Government....BIG DEAL..that means NOTHING.
It is a puppet government that will crumble at any minute.
All the US did was take a bad situation and make it worse.
What ever happens in IRAQ the US is gonna come out a loser as it should.
What gives americans the right to invade other counties based on their lies...that is what the Germans did during WWII
2007-02-12 00:52:48 · 8 answers · asked by rattlecattle717 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Sounds like you need to learn more about the situation before running your mouth.
In fact your comment about the 'puppet government' is an obvious indicator that you have no clue.
Iraq has a a Constitution voted on an approved by their people in a national referendum - that was monitored and approved by the UN for fairness. The have a parliamentary government that was elected by the Iraqi people - in an election that was monitored and approved by the UN for fairness.
The people fighting our troops are fighting in opposition to the will of the Iraqi people.
2007-02-12 02:39:17 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well it's easy enough to say what the US is doing wrong. We can all do that. So what would have been the right thing to do in Iraq? Is there even such a thing? If we would not have ousted Saddam, would the world be a much different place now? If the US took back all of it's troops and assets all over the world and placed them back in the US solely for the defense of itself, I'm sure someone would complain about that too. In the eyes of the world, the US either does too much or not enough.
2007-02-12 09:11:16 · answer #2 · answered by Land Warrior 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your history is all wrong. Germany invaded poland, austria, norway, checkosvolkia before the war even began with britain. The info may have been flawed about Iraq, but did Tonly Blair lie too, Putin did he go in on thelie, Cherac and many more.. Does evidence exist that saddam used the oil for food program to begin a nuclar program, yes. you can pick the facts you want tobelieve, but that is very dangerous.
2007-02-12 08:59:00 · answer #3 · answered by 79vette 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You must have been cheering for Zarqawi.
Lets assume the U.S. is causing "instability" in Iraq. What is wrong with that?
Why shouldn't the U.S. "de-stabilize" the entire region?
If you want to call the middle east stable, pre operation Iraqi freedom, go right ahead.
2007-02-12 09:07:48 · answer #4 · answered by csn0331 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I agree. Watch this shocking video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9A_vxIOB-I
It more than enough proof.
Also, I agree with all your statements. The US needs to learn a painful lesson and must be the losers. They just can't invade a stable nation. They are like the Nazis.
As for the right, they think that their are globo-cops. But don't worry, the era of American dominance will end by 2008. Then the world will know true peace as each nation becomes powerful and builds strong alliances instead of one big master bully telling them what to do.
2007-02-12 08:55:58 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Ignorent cowards like you are causing instability in life,and wasting oxygen.
2007-02-12 22:08:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here are some of the lies right here:
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=Halabja&btnG=Google+Search&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi
2007-02-12 09:11:08 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
USA is biggest terrorist on this planet.....
2007-02-12 09:21:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋